Answer:
Yes. Southam's research was "more wrong"
Explanation:
They both didn't seek the informed consent of their patients and we're both wrong. However, Southam injected patients(both healthy and unhealthy) with cancerous cells to see how their bodies would react. This was terribly wrong seeing that he put unsuspecting patients in danger. Elsie on the other hand, collected tissue samples from his patients to conduct his research which is a clear violation of their rights but clearly not as deadly as Southam's.
The students are experiencing difficulty in grammar. Grammar
is being defined as the structure of the language or the language’s whole
system by which it is taken in a manner of having to contain morphology and as
well as syntax and it also sometimes include semantics and phonology.
Natural wilderness should be protected regardless of the needs of humans is an example of the preservationist point of view.
<h3>What is
preservationist point of view?</h3>
The preservationist point of view focus on the belief that humans can have access to the land, even though they have the access they should make sure they utilize it for its natural beauty as well as inspiration.
This point of view place important value on the land b as well as what you can use from it, this is because they believe that land has an intrinsic value, which implies that it is very valuable in itself , hence Natural wilderness should be protected regardless of the needs of humans is an example of the preservationist point of view.
Find out more on preservationist at brainly.com/question/24928640
#SPJ1
Answer: A climate which is typical of equatorial and tropical regions, i.e., one with continually high temperatures with considerable precipitation, at least during part of the year.
Explanation:
just finished a paper on it