Answer:
O Anaya structures his excerpt as an analysis, while Nye structures her excerpt as an observation.
Explanation:
In the first excerpt, Rudolfo Anaya presents a case of his friend who decided to 'remove' his heritage, his Latin background just to get accepted for a scholarship. And in this act, Anaya observes that his friend <em>"took out his native language, the poetic patois of our reality . . . took the soul out of his poetry." </em>This shows his analysis of what he saw and thinks is happening, giving his opinion.
On the other hand, Naomi Shihab Nye structures "Speaking Arabic" as an observation of what she saw. She describes the young man's declaration of wanting a heritage among the <em>"tall America trees"</em> while in a Texas fair in between the <em>"German Oom-pah Sausage Stand and the Mexican Gorditas booth".</em> The excerpt is an observation of what she saw at that time and place.
Thus, the <u>correct answer is that Anaya structures his excerpt as an analysis while Nye's is an observation.
</u>
Answer:
breaking the bill –> C. giving change
common clay–> B. ordinary man
trifle –> H. small amount
larks –> F. tricks
Explanation:
Answer:
For exact reason like what happen to them, Because it can cause problems for people and make the child be placed in a different section then other kids and the child will then be labeled and most likely bullied for his problems
Explanation:
This would be the answer because they ARE framing the picture
<span>The correct answer is D. they are imprisoned by the people of the fair. Christian and his companion are not interested in what the merchants at the Vanity Fair have to offer them, and they cause quite a disturbance at the market. This is why they get detained, and are beaten up and locked in a cage afterwards.</span>
