The argument that uses a non sequitur fallacy is C, "Regulations on motorists should be lifted because factories are a bigger source of pollution"
Explanation: Non sequitur fallacy is when the conclusion doesn't follow the premises. That said in different words, the premises is an irrelevant reason to support the conclusion.
So, as true as it is that factories are a bigger source of pollution, the conclusion does not follow from the premises. The fact that regulations on motorists should be lifted, does not necessarily mean that the reason to do that is that factories are a bigger source of pollution.
Answer:
<em>noun</em><em>:</em><em> </em><em>an intense feeling of deep affection.</em><em> </em><em>(</em><em>example</em><em>)</em><em>"babies fill parents with feelings of love"</em>
<em> </em><em> </em><em> </em><em> </em><em> </em><em> </em><em> </em><em> </em><em> </em><em> </em><em>a great interest and pleasure in something.</em><em>(</em><em> </em><em>example</em><em>)</em><em> </em><em>"his love for football"</em>
<em>verb</em><em>:</em><em> </em><em>feel deep affection for (someone).</em><em>(</em><em>example</em><em>)</em><em>"he loved his sister dearly"</em>
<em> </em><em> </em><em> </em><em> </em><em> </em><em> </em><em> </em><em> </em><em> </em><em> </em><em>like or enjoy very much.</em><em>(</em><em>example</em><em>)</em><em>"I just love dancing"</em>
No it is not its a noun Im pretty sure. Hope is helped:)
Imelda Marcos, First Lady of Phillipines (1965-1986)
___________________________________
Imelda baby, what you do? XD
Answer:
"Set forward a broad principle that Dirksen then relates to an initiative that he supports."