Answer:
C.
Explanation: It is right.
Answer: A. designating an anti-charity should be more effective because loss aversion will provide additional motivation
.
Options:
A. designating an anti-charity should be more effective because loss
aversion will provide additional motivation
B. designating a charity should be more effective because it avoids all potential for loss
C. it shouldn’t matter whether one designates a charity or anti-charity
D. self-interest biases generally keep people from choosing the anti-charity
Explanation:
The study of behavioral Economics shows that people are more driven by the loss of fear than the hope of gain. This is known as loss aversion. In commitment contracts where penalty money is promised to a charity or an anti-charity if the goal is not achieved, those who promise their money to an anti-charity tend to achieve their goals more. The same also applies when comparing this group and those who do not have to forego anything if they do not meet their target.
This is because giving to a charity will still seem beneficial while losing the money to an anti-charity will seem like a total loss.
Its a plant that has conducting tissue.
Answer:
<em>Ritual Chains Interaction</em>
Explanation:
Ritual Chains Interaction is a major piece of sociological principle which aims to establish a "progressive microsociology."
It suggests that successful rituals generate symbols of group membership and pump individuals with emotional energy, while unsuccessful rituals siphon emotional energy.
Every individual flows from situation to situation, attracted to those relationships in which the best payoff for emotional energy is provided by their cultural capital.
Thought can be clarified in the flow of circumstances by internalizing conversations; individual selves are deeply and constantly socially constructed from the outside in.
NASA’s Mariner 10 took photos of Mercury
