Answer:
Person versus nature
Explanation:
"A fierce rain had swollen the middle fork of the Kentucky river."
"The brown water overflowed its muddy banks."
And the epilogue - "Not even a flooded river could stand between Mary Breckinridge and the hospital her patients needed."
The text provides evidence of her going up against the forces of nature rather than the other options.
<span>"His historical researches, however, did not lie so much among books as among men; for the former are lamentably scanty on his favorite topics; whereas he found the old burghers, and still more their wives, rich in that legendary lore, so invaluable to true history. Whenever, therefore, he happened upon a genuine Dutch family, snugly shut up in its low-roofed farmhouse, under a spreading sycamore, he looked upon it as a little clasped volume of black-letter,' and studied it with the zeal of a book-worm.""Rip Van Winkle," 1994 edition, 1-2
</span>
Hello, you did not show the text to which this question refers, which makes it impossible to answer it accurately. However, if an author wants to offer information about Macarthism without offering opinions to the reader, the option that must be made is "by presenting only the facts that support a particular view of the era."
This allows the author to explain what was happening, to present important points about Macarthism, to show how it fit into the community, without presenting any opinion, but maintaining the reader's understanding.
Answer:
imma go with b but u said c or d and my choice is d
