1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
olganol [36]
3 years ago
10

How did the communist government intervene in family life during the cultural revolution

History
1 answer:
drek231 [11]3 years ago
7 0
The government was heavily intervene all family members that exist in the country.

First, the Government only allowed a certain things that could be taught by the parents to their children.

second, when a family member is condemned as guilty for disobeying the government, the other families will also be punished. Which created a massive fear throughout the households.
You might be interested in
How would you describe the life in the court of suleiman the magnificent court
DochEvi [55]
The Europeans called him "The Magnificent," but the Ottomans called him Kanuni, or "The Lawgiver." The Suleymanie Mosque, built for Suleyman, describes Suleyman in its inscription as Nashiru kawanin al-Sultaniyye , or "Propagator of the Sultanic Laws." The primacy of Suleyman as a law-giver is at the foundation of his place in Islamic history and world view. It is perhaps important to step back a moment and closely examine this title to fully understand Suleyman's place in history.

The word used for law here, kanun, has a very specific reference. In Islamic tradition, the Shari'ah, or laws originally derived from the Qur'an , are meant to be universally applied across all Islamic states. No Islamic ruler has the power to overturn or replace these laws. So what laws was Suleyman "giving" to the Islamic world? What precisely does kanun refer to since it doesn't refer to the main body of Islamic law, the Shari'ah ?

The kanun refer to situational decisions that are not covered by the Shari'ah . Even though the Shari'ah provides all necessary laws, it's recognized that some situations fall outside their parameters. In Islamic tradition, if a case fell outside the parameters of the Shari'ah , then a judgement or rule in the case could be arrived at through analogy with rules or cases that are covered by the Shari'ah . This method of juridical thinking was only accepted by the most liberal school of Shari'ah , Hanifism, so it is no surprise that Hanifism dominated Ottoman law.

The Ottomans, however, elevated kanun into an entire code of laws independent of the Shari'ah. The first two centuries of Ottoman rule, from 1350 to 1550, saw an explosion of kanun rulings and laws, so that by the beginning of the sixteenth century, the kanun were a complete and independent set of laws that by and large were more important than the Shari'ah . This unique situation was brought about in part because of the unique heritage of the Ottomans. In both Turkish and Mongol traditions, the imperial law, or law pronounced by the monarch, was considered sacred. They even had a special word for it: the Turks called it Türe and the Mongols called it Yasa . In the system of Türe and Yasa , imperial law was regarded as the essential and sacred foundation of the empire. When this tradition collided with the Islamic Shari'ah tradition, a compromised system combining both was formed.

The Sultanic laws were first collected together by Mehmed the Conqueror. Mehmed divided the kanun into two separate sets or laws. The first set dealt with the organization of government and the military, and the second set dealt with the taxation and treatment of the peasantry. The latter group was added to after the death of Mehmed and the Ottoman kanun pretty much crystallized into its final form in 1501. Suleyman, for his part, revised the law code, but on the whole the Suleyman code of laws is pretty identical to the 1501 system of laws. However, it was under Suleyman that the laws took their final form; no more revisions were made after his reign. From this point onwards, this code of laws was called, kanun-i 'Osmani , or the "Ottoman laws."

Hope this helps
4 0
3 years ago
Which of the following best describes the Wilmot Proviso?
Tom [10]
What are the following choices?
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What are the effects of watching televison on Adolescents
Vitek1552 [10]
Usually, kids at this age are easily influenced by anything they see, either in their life, or on TV. So they will often try to imitate what happens on TV, whether consciously or unconsciously, that is not that important. Also, many studies have dealt with this question, and whether or not violence on TV actually causes violence of people in real life, but the results were always inconclusive. 
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A direct result o the neolithic revolution is that people
anastassius [24]
A direct result of the neolithic revolution is that people began living in permanent settlements, meaning they weren't considered nomads anymore - they stayed and settled in one place.
6 0
3 years ago
What is an easy way to remember who puritans were
Kazeer [188]
Well because Puritans were a group of people with religious moral beliefs this means they were very spiritual and religious, which reminds me of the word pure.
Because religious beliefs require you to have a pure, clean heart before God, this could remind you of the word puritans, pure-itans --  because Puritans were religious.

Also, puritans were a group of English Protestants, that can also help you! Protestants - puritans, both start with P and when you remember the word protestants you'll remember that they protested against the church of England under Queen Elizabeth to change and simply forms of worship because they knew it was not the way it should be.

Lastly, Puritans came right after the Pilgrims in the 1630s. Both these words start with P also and they will remind you that Puritans had a great influence in the world just like the Pilgrims. The puritans grew discontent with how the church of England had become (just like the pilgrims) and they wanted to change it. The Puritans brought a huge impact on the church of England with their Christian passion and beliefs. Both the Pilgrims and the Puritans sought to make a difference in the world in light of their faith and beliefs in God. They both brought a new religious freedom to the world by sharing their Christian faith to the world.
The pilgrims will help you remember who the puritans were :)

So, Ways to Remember 
1. PURE-itans (they were members of a religious movement) remember the "pure" in puritans
2. Puritans were Protestants - both start with P (reminds you that they protested against the Church of England & the forms of worship practiced)
3. Puritans and the Pilgrims - (both start with p) remember they shared the same beliefs! and they both fought for their Christian faith and had a huge impact on the Christian church!

Hope this Helps!! Let me know if you have more questions :))


8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Who financed much of the industrialization in the first half of the nineteenth century?
    10·1 answer
  • What were the opposing points of view that made the Great Compromise necessary?
    10·1 answer
  • What year was the India Pakistan war?
    15·2 answers
  • Which of the following was NOT one of the accomplishments of progressives?
    10·1 answer
  • What program was put together to provide jobs and electricity to rare areas of the United States.
    5·1 answer
  • After reclaiming much of the Iberian Peninsula, _____ and _____ led the way in expanding further contact from within the early z
    7·2 answers
  • What are two adjectives to describe the mood of, The Hunters of Kentucky?
    12·2 answers
  • Which statement is supported by the date in the graph?
    8·1 answer
  • What causes convection currents in earth's mantle?
    15·2 answers
  • A explanation<br> of how this new species of orca is different from others and where it is found.
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!