Answer:
B. Cherise’s thesis is acceptable because it summarizes the general points of the text.
Explanation:
Thesis Statement - a part of the introductory paragraph of an essay
Elimination
C. Cherise’s thesis needs revision because it expresses an opinion and should not. - it cannot be C because it is not a opinion it's a statement from the story.
D. Cherise’s thesis needs revision because it lacks textual evidence about the topic. - its not D because a thesis statement doesn't need evidence it's just a little part putting the main idea in a sentence.
A. Cherise’s thesis is acceptable because it expresses an opinion about the subject. - its not A because again the thesis statement cannot be an opinion.
<h3><u>Thankyou for letting me answer.</u></h3><h3><u>Have a good day!</u></h3>
C.) Perhaps this evasive maneuver will finally restore my shilling's value in the eyes of others.
Answer:
Public school students do not lose their constitutional rights when they walk through the schoolhouse doors. The U.S. Supreme Court has recognized that “students in school as well as out of school are ‘persons’ under our Constitution.” This means that they possess First Amendment rights to express themselves in a variety of ways. They can write articles for the school newspaper, join clubs, distribute literature, and petition school officials.
But public school students do not possess unlimited First Amendment rights. Two legal principles limit their rights. First, as the Supreme Court has said, minors do not possess the same level of constitutional rights as adults. Second, the government generally has greater power to dictate policy when it acts in certain capacities, such as educator, employer or jailer. For instance, a school principal can restrict a student from cursing a teacher in class or in the hallway. However, the principal would have limited, if any, authority to punish a student for criticizing a school official off-campus.
Explanation:
I hope this helps
