A set of playing cards that are only blots of ink are given to Mr. Lecter. On these cards, he is instructed to describe what he observes. Mr. Lecter is most likely completing a projective test.
In psychology, a projective test is an examination that frequently uses ambiguous stimuli, including inkblots (Rorschach Test) and mysterious images (Thematic Apperception Test), to elicit reactions that may reveal aspects of the subject's personality by projecting internal attitudes, traits, and behavioral patterns onto the external stimuli.
Less frequently, projective tests are also used to examine how people learn. Other projective techniques include association tests using spoken words as the stimuli, which require respondents to construct wooden block structures, finish phrases, paint with their fingers, or offer samples of their handwriting.
The usefulness and dependability of projective tests depend on a variety of factors, such as the degree to which identical personality interpretations can be made by various evaluators using the same test data and the degree to which those interpretations are supported by personality assessments from other sources.
Learn more about projective test here
brainly.com/question/10379868
#SPJ4
Is it multiple choice or written answer? If multiple choice, can I please have the options?
The correct answer is C) because they wanted to avoid the discomfort of facing an unpopular view.
<em>In the majority opinion, Fortas suggested that the reason the school authorities suspended the students was that they wanted to avoid the discomfort of facing an unpopular view. </em>
We are referring to the case Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District that was decided on February 24, 1969.
In 1965, five students decided to wear black armbands in protest of the Vietnam War and they were suspended by the school for doing that. In the majority opinion, Judge Abe Fortas suggested that the reason the school authorities suspended the students was that they wanted to avoid the discomfort of facing an unpopular view. At the end of the case, the Court decided that the use of armbands as a protest was not a motive to cause any disruption and that the protest was protected by freedom of speech.
Because of all of the new settlement and diseases which they were not imune to.
It illustrates the concpet of checks and balances.