Answer:
Piercing the corporate veil
Explanation:
This are the options that come with this question:
- hiding behind the corporate skirt.
- whistleblowing.
- piercing the corporate veil.
- limited liability.
This is an example of the doctrine of "piercing the corporate veil." This describes a situation in which the shareholders of a corporation can be held personally liable for the debts and liabilities of a corporation, according to a court. This is in contrast to common practice in corporations, which assumes that, if a corporation is sued, the shareholders cannot be brought into the lawsuit. "Piercing the corporate veil" usually occurs in the case of fraud, or in the case of egregious and willful activity that put corporate gain over the public good.
The only answer that really makes sense here is c. United States. I think US buys around half of Mexico's oil
What is relevant here is the trade agreement between the two (also including Canada, but US is buying more): NAFTA.
23. should be false and 24. true
Answer:
C. The economy has been growing rapidly
Explanation:
Just did it and got it right.