The power of veto was not just restricted to the consuls. All officers of state (consuls, praetors, censors, aediles and quaestors) had the power of veto. Officers of the same rank could veto each other and officers of higher rank could veto officers of lower rank.
The tri-state water dispute is a 21st-century water-use conflict among the states of Georgia, Alabama, and Florida over flows in the Apalachicola-Chattahoochee-Flint River Basin<span> and the </span>Alabama-Coosa-Tallapoosa<span> River Basin.. so answer should be D
</span>
Answer: True
Explanation:
Eric is in fact faced by an ethical dilemma. Should he decide to act in an ethical manner and refuse to fill the fresh produce with some older produce, his business could die.
Should he decide to act in a non ethical manner though, his business will continue for some time.
He is faced with the option of being ethical or non ethical.
That is his ethical dilemma.
Here is information for both perspectives:
Federalists
I would support the federalists because they believed in a strong central government that would help to unite the states. Along with this, the creation of a new stronger federal government would help to solve the problems America faced under its first constitution, the Articles of Confederation. Under the Articles of Confederation, the federal government could not tax or even raise an army. With the new US Constitution, the federal government would have these necessary powers in order to ensure safety within American society.
Anti-Federalists
I would support the Anti-Federalists because they were advocates of states rights. Along with this, the Anti-Federalists knew that a central government with too much power could very easily result in a monarchy, much like the one the United States experienced when controlled by Great Britain.
