I think that its either A or D! hope this helps
Answer and Explanation:
The recording and the computations are as follows
a. The recording of the October revenue transactions are shown below:
DATE INVOICE NO. ACCOUNT DEBITED POST.REF.
ACCOUNT REC. DR. FEES EARNED CR.
Oct 2 321 Pryor Co.
380
Oct 3 322 Armor Co.
540
Oct 14 323 Pryor co.
190
Oct 24 324 Rose co.
790
Oct 31 1900
b) Now the total amount for account receivable and fees earned is
Account receivable = 1900
Fees earned = 1900
c) The October 31 balance is
October 31 balance
= $380 + $190 - $380
= $190
Amount invested in both schemes is $45,000
returns in investment g is 75,000 in 6 years.
yearly return is:
75000/6=12,500
returns in investment h is 105,000 in 9 years
yearly return is:
105,000/9
=11,666.67
from the above results we can conclude that investment g has the higher returns.
Answer:
c. liable on the ground that Mesa is an intended third-party beneficiary
Explanation:
In a contract, the third-party beneficiary is a business or a person that benefits from the agreement and the terms of the contract that is made between the two other parties. According to law, third-party beneficiary have certain rights which they can enforced if the contract is not fulfilled.
In the context, Mesa is a third party beneficiary. The Mesa County enters into a contract with New Construct Inc. to construct a court house. Now New Construct Inc. again hires the firm Odell to excavate the land site.
While excavating Odell damages few nearby properties, so Mesa County files a law suit against Odell. But Odell argues that Odell is not in agreement with Mesa County or have not entered into with any contract with the County, so Mesa cannot sue the excavator.
But the court hold that as Mesa County is the third party beneficiary of the contract and have certain rights, Odell is held liable for the loss and should compensate for the loss to the County.
