Balance between government and individual freedom is the constitutional principle supported by Amendment IV.
Option A
<u>Explanation</u>:
The fourth amendment is about securing people's rights and freedom, the amendment is in regard to the protection of people from the state's actions that are not based upon the reason and probable cause the crime or any other kind of legal offence has been committed. It is to maintain individual safety along with national safety as a whole.
Like after 9/11 National Security Agency (NSA) increased their efforts for public safety but without disturbing individual freedom. So, both these things are opposite to balance but are possible.
Some effects are:
<span>- A new republic in France </span>
<span>- the fall of Metternich </span>
<span>- promises of reform in Austria, Italy, and Prussia </span>
<span>- A new empire established in France </span>
<span>- Success in liberalism, nationalism, and socialism </span>
Because if people believed the scientist the pope would not have control of the people.
He thought it was a reduction of personal liberty.
John L. Sullivan was a boxing legend. Even having drinking problems his entire life, he took a step ahead on stopping this practice. He decided to not dring anymore as long as he lived, but he had no hard feelings against a man who does. In his view If a man can take a drink and get away with it, so much the better, but yours truly has found long since that whiskey is not for him. He was against prohibition though. He thought it was a reduction of personal liberty.
