The answer is number two.
Answer:
(7)2+x
Step-by-step explanation:
Seven times 2 plus x if you want to solve for it the answer would be 14x, I think.
The experimental probability of each event is as follows:
- Landing open side up = 1/50 = 0.02 = 2%.
- Landing closed side up = 5/50 = 1/10 = 0.1 = 10%.
- Landing on its side = 44/50 = 0.88 = 88%.
The experimental probability of an event is the ratio of the number of outcomes that favored the event to the total number of outcomes in the experiment.
In the question, we are given that Jake tossed a paper cup 50 times and recorded the position how it landed, which is shown in the table:
Open-sided up: 1
Closed side up 5
On the side: 44.
We are asked to determine the experimental probability of each outcome.
The number of outcomes, when the landing is open-sided up is 1.
The number of outcomes, when the landing is closed-sided up is 5.
The number of outcomes, when the landing is on the side up is 44.
The total number of times the experiment took place is 50.
Thus, the experimental probability of each event is as follows:
- Landing open side up = 1/50 = 0.02 = 2%.
- Landing closed side up = 5/50 = 1/10 = 0.1 = 10%.
- Landing on its side = 44/50 = 0.88 = 88%.
Learn more about the experimental probability at
brainly.com/question/24298250
#SPJ4
Answer:
See explanation below
Step-by-step explanation:
Here, a director of manufacturing must convince management that a proposed manufacturing method reduces costs before the new method can be implemented. The current production method operates with a mean cost of $220 per hour.
a) The alternative and null hypotheses would be:
H0: μ ≥ 220
Ha: μ < 220
b) Comment on the conclusion when H0 cannot be rejected:
When we fail to reject the null hypothesis H0, there is not enough evidence to conclude that the mean cost can be reduced from $220. Therefore the manager's proposed method cannot be implemented.
c) Comment on the conclusion when H0 can be rejected:
When the null hypothesis, H0 is rejected, there is enough evidence to conclude that the mean cost can be reduced from from $220. Therefore the manager's proposed method can be implemented.
