Answer:
Bonus Army, gathering of probably 10,000 to 25,000 World War I veterans (estimates vary widely) who, with their wives and children, converged on Washington, D.C., in 1932, demanding immediate bonus payment for wartime services to alleviate the economic hardship of the Great Depression.
Adjusted Compensation certificates, or bonuses, had been approved by Congress in 1924 but were not scheduled for full payment until 1945. In an effort to force early lump-sum payment of these urgently needed benefits, the Bonus Army, sometimes called the “Bonus Expeditionary Force,” converged on the nation’s capital in the spring of 1932; they moved into abandoned shacks below the Capitol and set up shanties and tents along the Anacostia River
Explanation:
Answer:
I'm going with B
Explanation:
It can't be A because the war took place in America and that is not the Brits home turf and can't be C because the natives almost definitely didn't like the brits. I'm not sure on D but B seems more likely over that.
The Spanish influence improved Aztec civilisation by introducing new ideas and technologies. They shared European agricultural techniques, domestic animals, sugar cane, wheat, and more with the Aztecs. The Spanish conquest was noteworthy because it put a stop to the Aztecs' ritualized killing of human beings. This is further explained below.
<h3>The Aztecs and the Conquistadores?</h3>
Generally, The Spanish colonization of Mexico and the subsequent fall of the Aztec Empire are variously referred to as the "Conquest of Mexico" or simply "the Spanish."
In conclusion, On August 13, 1521, Cortes was able to overcome Cuauhtemoc's resistance at Tenochtitlan with the support of the Aztecs' local enemies. It is estimated that 240,000 Aztecs perished in the city's capture, marking the end of the empire.
Read more about Aztecs
brainly.com/question/11253411
#SPJ1
The correct answer is C) Simon Commission did not have a single India member.
Identify the appropriate reasons for the boycott of the Simon Commission by the Indian: "Simon Commission did not have a single India member."
When we talk about the Simon Commission we are referring to the Indian Statutory Commission of 1928. It was formed by the members of the British Parliament who visited India to investigate the situations and possible reformations in the country. However, Indian people strongly opposed to the formation of that commission by the simple fact that there were no Indian people in that group. So, how foreign politicians were going to implement political reformations in Indian without the participation of the native people of India?
That is shy prominent Hindu people such as Mahatma Gandhi, Nehru, and the Muslim League protested.
