Answer:
Marxist Communism main difference with Maoism is the source of the revolution and its extent. In Marxist-Communism the proletariat revolution starts in the cities and industrial areas, trying to achieve control over the means of production. In Maoism, the revolution starts in rural areas and does not require an advanced industry to happen.
The difference is historically important, according to Marx, the proletarian revolution arises inevitably from the class struggle between the Capitalist and the Proletariat. For Marxist-Communism, the revolution emerges from a crisis of advanced capitalism. In Maoism, the revolution can emerge before there is any kind of advanced capitalism.
Marxist-Communism is much more based on historical materialism or the understanding of history and society through the economy. Maoism rejects some of the dogmas of historical materialism.
In a sense, Maoism is more nationalistic because it emerged from practice in the specific conditions of China. It also has a different relationship with the west because it rejects, in principle, industrial development and capitalism as a necessary stage.
Explanation:
Government makes all economic decisions & owns most of the property.
Sometimes called communism.
Examples: Cuba, former Soviet Union, North Korea.
This system has not been very successful & more and more countries are abandoning it.
HOPE THIS HELPED!!!!! XD
Answer:
The basic government and society in Europe during the middle ages was based around the feudal system. Small communities were formed around the local lord and the manor. The lord owned the land and everything in it. He would keep the peasants safe in return for their service.
Explanation:
A statement in the Declaration of Independence confirms that with these statements:
We hold these truths (Natural and Individual Rights) to be self-evident, that all men created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
Answer:
murder
Explanation:
Heller, the U.S. Supreme Court decision upholding a federal district ruling that a Washington, D.C. law banning handguns and requiring other firearms to be stored unloaded or locked was unconstitutional on Second Amendment grounds.Heller sued the District of Columbia. He sought an injunction against the enforcement of the relevant parts of the Code and argued that they violated his Second Amendment right to keep a functional firearm in his home without a license. The district court dismissed the complaint.
