The theory of Cultural transmission was used by Edwin Sutherland to emphasize that criminal behavior is learned through social interactions with others.
<h3>
What is the theory of cultural transmission?</h3>
- According to cultural transmission theory, often known as socialization, all conduct is learned from the society or culture around a person.
- These actions might be either prosocial or antisocial.
- For example, some festivals or lifestyle patterns can be passed down through generations and friends.
- One example of cultural transmission is holiday decorations.
- Experiential learning is another approach for people to learn about the culture.
- People learn through immersing themselves in the culture and commenting on hands-on experiences.
As the definition itself says, according to cultural transmission theory, often known as socialization, all conduct is learned from the society or culture around a person.
Therefore, the theory of Cultural transmission was used by Edwin Sutherland to emphasize that criminal behavior is learned through social interactions with others.
Know more about cultural transmission theory here:
brainly.com/question/1078270
#SPJ4
According to the movie and the context of it:
The meaning of "mayo on fries" for sociology is that there are other sensible ways to eat french fries. The concept itself has to do with sociological imagination reated in a way of connecting the issue of a person with the forces withih history base.
Answer:
The effects of climate change are now being seen in all Europe's seas. Climate change is causing sea surface temperatures and sea levels to rise. ... As a result, coral reefs in Europe's overseas territories — known as centres of biodiversity — are threatened by both increasing temperatures and acidification.
Explanation:
Iron lungs? tell me if I am wrong I am sorta curious
Answer:
C. The Supremacy clause
Explanation:
The supremacy clause stated that in case there is a conflict between the state legislation and the Federal legislation, the federal legislation will always overpower the state legislation.
From the case above:
- Brad obtains a permit from the Federal government to fish in that area.
- The State banned Brad to fish in that area.
By contradicting the Feds, California actually violates the supremacy clause. Brad should've been allowed to fish in that area.
