The correct answer is D. The Wars of the Roses were fought between the rivals for the English throne. They were fought in several sporadic episodes between 1455 and 1487, although there was related fighting before and after this period. The name Wars of the Roses refers to Heraldic badges associated with the two royal houses, the White Rose of York and the Red Rose of Lancaster. The Wars of the Roses came to the common use<span> in the nineteenth century, after the publication of Anne of the Geierstein by Sir Walter Scott in 1829.</span>
The correct answer for this question is this one: " C) Congress was responding to the nativists' calls to "Keep America for Americans."
<span>Following World War I, the Congress limit immigration from countries in southern and eastern Europe because </span><span> the <u>congress was responding to the nativists' calls to "Keep America for Americans.</u></span>
Hope this helps answer your question and have a nice day ahead.
Answer:
A. France is your correct answer.
Can I get Brainliest? Thx Peace...
The first settlers came over from Europe by ship.
Hopefully this is what you were looking for, if not let me know and I can give you more information.
Facts
Gregory Lee Johnson burned an American flag outside of the convention center where the 1984 Republican National Convention was being held in Dallas, Texas. Johnson burned the flag to protest the policies of President Ronald Reagan. He was arrested and charged with violating a Texas statute that prevented the desecration of a venerated object, including the American flag, if such action were likely to incite anger in others. A Texas court tried and convicted Johnson. He appealed, arguing that his actions were "symbolic speech" protected by the First Amendment. The Supreme Court agreed to hear his case.
Issue
Whether flag burning constitutes "symbolic speech" protected by the First Amendment.
Ruling
Yes.
Reasoning
(5-4)
The majority of the Court, according to Justice William Brennan, agreed with Johnson and held that flag burning constitutes a form of "symbolic speech" that is protected by the First Amendment. The majority noted that freedom of speech protects actions that society may find very offensive, but society's outrage alone is not justification for suppressing free speech.
In particular, the majority noted that the Texas law discriminated upon viewpoint, i.e., although the law punished actions, such as flag burning, that might arouse anger in others, it specifically exempted from prosecution actions that were respectful of venerated objects, e.g., burning and burying a worn-out flag. The majority said that the government could not discriminate in this manner based solely upon viewpoint.
Dissent
Justice Stevens
Writing for the dissent, Justice Stevens argued that the flag's unique status as a symbol of national unity outweighed "symbolic speech" concerns, and thus, the government could lawfully prohibit flag burning.
