Answer:
Preparing breakfast and lunvh
Explanation:
Answer:
The answer is "nasty, British, and short"
Your answer is C. A law establishing a plan for surveying western lands.
This question is incomplete. Here's the complete question.
? → The sixth amendment grants the right to trial by jury of the state
and district where the crime has been committed
Which excerpt from the Declaration of Independence best replaces the question mark in the graphic above?
1"For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent."
2"He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people."
3"For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences."
4"He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good."
Answer: 3"For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences."
Explanation:
The chosen excerpt refers to one of the many grievances listed by the colonists against King George III and the British government in the Declaration of Independence. Specifically, it addressed the unfair trials to which many colonists were subjected (they were sent to England, under false claims and judged without a trial by jury). The Sixth Amendment, in addition to establishing the right to a speedy and public trial, to call witnesses, and to have an impartial jury, established that any crime should be judged in the same jurisdiction where it was committed.
Remembering Tiananmen in Hong Kong has been viewed as an act of defiance for years, and it has become even more so now that the city’s own democratic future has come under threat. In the run-up to the 30th anniversary, demonstrators marched through the semi-autonomous enclave’s financial district chanting, “justice will prevail” and toting “support freedom” umbrellas. “In China, [people] can’t say anything against the government,” says Au Wai Sze, a nurse in Hong Kong who marched along with her 15-year-old daughter. “So while we in Hong Kong can still speak [out], we must represent the voice of the Chinese people and remind the world of this injustice.” Remembering Tiananmen in Hong Kong has been viewed as an act of defiance for years, and it has become even more so now that the city’s own democratic future has come under threat. In the run-up to the 30th anniversary, demonstrators marched through the semi-autonomous enclave’s financial district chanting, “justice will prevail” and toting “support freedom” umbrellas. “In China, [people] can’t say anything against the government,” says Au Wai Sze, a nurse in Hong Kong who marched along with her 15-year-old daughter. “So while we in Hong Kong can still speak [out], we must represent the voice of the Chinese people and remind the world of this injustice.”
For all its power, China’s government is still deeply paranoid. Today, the regime is “stronger on the surface than at any time since the height of Mao’s power, but also more brittle,” Andrew Nathan, a professor of political science at Columbia University, wrote in Foreign Affairs. The people’s loyalty is predicated on wealth accumulation, which will be difficult to sustain. A sputtering economy, widespread environmental pollution, rampant corruption and soaring inequality have all fed public anxieties about Xi’s ability to continue fulfilling the prosperity-for-loyalty bargain.
