Answer:
Indians believed that freedom was given to them by nature and they did not have to follow particular guidelines from a government. Their religion was based on worshiping the gods and what nature brings to people,following particular religious rituals was crucial to them .
Land was considered a scarred place that doesn't need to be owned as a commodity but that needed to be distributed equally
Indian women lived by certain religious values from the way they dressed to the way they carried themselves in the society . European women had different role which were more liberated playing into politics, and a functional role in society.
They took land and made it a commodity and it was distributed unequal based of the affluent status of individual.
They had different religions that they could follow since they lived liberated as compared to Indians or natives.
The answer is that "<span>Kohlberg's approach is a justice perspective while Gilligans is a care perspective".
The larger part of research on the moral advancement of medical attendants is in accordance with Kohlberg's hypothesis. However, Gilligan noticed that care and equity viewpoints coexist in moral clash, and during the development procedure, every supplement each other and advances moral improvement and development.
</span>
Hmm. I'm not sure if you would agree iwth the topics that I'm giving but I'll try my best.
You can write about...
Medieval times
How the world has changed. As in like, before and after
Tools or other objects that existed before but dont exist now
What it would have been like if people back then had the stuff we had now. As in, would there have been a change in how they lived? How would it help them?
Should people have been treated differently?
What each level of government meant (depending on where or which time your writing about)
Thats all I can think of.. I hope this helped!
