In the sentence:
My best friend wrote a funny poem about her pet rabbit.
The simple subject is 'friend'. Remember that a simple subject is the main word or words in a subject, so it does not include any of the modifiers that might describe, characterize or restrict the subject (in this case, the possesive 'my' and the adjective 'best')
To conclude is to have enough information to make a conclusion
Answer:
Bots sadly can not talk they are programmed to say thing for example "You have been warned"
bots mostly watch over people and the questions if u report something a bot welcome and check it out and if needed the bot well ban u or just delete the answer if u get at least 10 warnings from a bot u can get logged out of ur account
Explanation:
Ani analyses how "DeLuca's haphazard patchwork of reasoning and evidence leaves the reader wondering whether he believes his own claim". According to Ani he quotes not only supporters of the Nobel price committee but also detractors. He includes a sampling of Dylan's lyrics and leaves them to speak for themselves.
The evidence (quotes) from the article that best supports Ani's evaluation are:
1. "And it’s a good thing [his lyrics] have been published, because if you’ve gone to see the famously sneering and syllable-garbling Dylan play live in recent years, you probably couldn’t understand a word he was singing."
We could interpret this quote as contradictory, it is not necessarily for or against Dylan's Nobel Price. You could say he is confusing his readers, he seems to be against the sung lyrics and for the published ones.
2. "On one end of Dylan's songwriting spectrum is the vengeful, resolute, and timeless 'Masters Of War' . . . . It’s high dudgeon at its finest: ‘Let me ask you one question: Is your money that good? / Will it buy you forgiveness? Do you think that it could?"
Ani also says that he does a sampling of the lyrics and allows them to speak for themselves. This excerpt shows part of a lyric from the song "Masters of War". He is not necessarily saying its a "good" or "bad" lyric, he describes it as: "vengeful, resolute, and timeless" the reader must decide about its quality or if it is the kind of work that deserves a Nobel Price.
Both. With Social media you can communicate with anyone online but you don’t communicate irl
