Shah's request to seek asy- lum in the to antagonize the new Iranian government and to do whatever was possi- ble to build a
A law which was created in order to directly protect consumers is: B. product safety laws.
<h3>What is a product?</h3>
A product can be defined as any physical object (tangible item) that is typically produced by a manufacturer so as to satisfy and meet the demands, needs or wants of every customer. Some examples of a product include the following:
- Mobile phones or Smartphones
- Television
- Microwave oven
- Pencil
- Refrigerator
- Computer
- Shampoo
<h3>What are
product safety laws?</h3>
Product safety laws can be defined as a set of law that were primarily enacted under the Consumer Product Safety Act of 1972, so as to regulate most of the processes and individuals that are either directly or indirectly involved in the creation of a consumer product.
In this context, we can reasonably infer and logically deduce that a law which was created in order to directly protect consumers is product safety laws.
Read more on product safety laws here: brainly.com/question/18215744
#SPJ1
Complete Question:
Which of these laws was created in order to directly protect consumers?
pollution laws
product safety laws
wage laws
equal opportunity laws
Answer:
See below
Explanation:
Augustulus was a teenager when he became a ruler in AD 475. He only lasted 10 months because he was 'disposed of' in AD 476. When Augustulus took power the empire was already pretty much ruined by previous rulers. His subjects did not respect him because he was way to young to take over an entire population of people. At the end of the day his father oversaw his politics advising him along the way.
Here is more information on Romulus Augustulus. Good luck.
https://www.historyextra.com/period/roman/life-of-the-week-romulus-augustus/
Answer:
4. The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority.
Explanation:
Number 4 is the best option that argues in favor of judicial review as it holds that the judicial's power should extend to ALL cases, in law and equity, under the Constitution, laws or treaties of the nation. Many interpret it to mean that the Judicial, then, has the power to review the actions of the Legislative and the Executive in case they do not comply with the law.
For example, if the legislative branch enacts a law that is not consistent with the Constitution (like a law that establishes a religion) the Supreme Court has the power to review it and declare it unconstitutional as it goes against the first amendment; and if the President were to start collecting taxes (which it is not one of their functions), the Supreme Court would also have the power to declare such act unconstitutional.
