They made use of the resources around them is one reason why early clans of hunter-gatherers are not considered civilizations. When you talk about civilizations, it means that people are building something or forming a society for development.
With regards to whether imperialism was a fair excuse for the Industrial Revolution, the answer is that <u>it was not. </u>
<u />
<h3>What was the relationship between imperialism and the Industrial Revolution?</h3>
- Raw materials were needed to produce more goods and so colonies were acquired to get these goods cheaply.
- New markets were needed to sell the goods produced as well.
Both of these are not good enough excuses for imperialism because these nations could have engaged in fair and mutually beneficial trade that would have led to both the colonized nations, and themselves, developing.
Find out more on imperialism at brainly.com/question/353575.
FALSE.
Portugal only had one major colony in the New World, and that was Brazil in South America.
Spain had colonies in North America, but they focused more on the rest of South America excluding Brazil more. The colonies they had in North America were quickly lost to Mexico and America.
Answer:
magna carta
Explanation:
because the americans wanted the english to follow their rules whenever they set foot on american soil
Answer:
it is NOT A or D it has to be B or C
