Answer:
Minimum value = 
- Set up the function in general form
- Determine the direction of the graph
- Calculate -b/2a
- Find the corresponding f(x) value
- Write your quadratic function in standard or vertex form
Please Mark Brainliest If This Helped!
Answer:
p(t) = 0.19e0.10t
=>p'(t) = 0.19e0.10t (0.10*1)
=>p'(t) = 0.019e0.10t
t = 0 represents 1994
for 2002, t=2002-1994 =8
in 2002
average price =p(8)
=>average price = 0.19e0.10*8
=>average price =0.422853... million
rate of increase =p'(8)
=>rate of increase = 0.019e0.10*8
=>rate of increase =0.0422853... million per year
p(8)=$ 0.42 million
p'(8)=$ 0.042 million per year
Answer:
3/4
Step-by-step explanation:
The total number of children is 8 and the number of girls is 6. This can be represented as 6/8.
You would then need to simplify...
6/2=3
8/2=4
which which lead you to 3/4!
Answer:
C has a zero slope
Step-by-step explanation:
A horizontal line has a slope of zero
A vertical line has an undefined slope
A positive slope goes up from left to right
A negative slope goes down from left to right
9514 1404 393
Answer:
4a. ∠V≅∠Y
4b. TU ≅ WX
5. No; no applicable postulate
6. see below
Step-by-step explanation:
<h3>4.</h3>
a. When you use the ASA postulate, you are claiming you have shown two angles and the side between them to be congruent. Here, you're given side TV and angle T are congruent to their counterparts, sides WY and angle W. The angle at the other end of segment TV is angle V. Its counterpart is the other end of segment WY from angle W. In order to use ASA, we must show ...
∠V≅∠Y
__
b. When you use the SAS postulate, you are claiming you have shown two sides and the angle between them are congruent. The angle T is between sides TV and TU. The angle congruent to that, ∠W, is between sides WY and WX. Then the missing congruence that must be shown is ...
TU ≅ WX
__
<h3>5.</h3>
The marked congruences are for two sides and a non-included angle. There is no SSA postulate for proving congruence. (In fact, there are two different possible triangles that have the given dimensions. This can be seen in the fact that the given angle is opposite the shortest of the given sides.)
"No, we cannot prove they are congruent because none of the five postulates or theorems can be used."
__
<h3>6.</h3>
The first statement/reason is always the list of "given" statements.
1. ∠A≅∠D, AC≅DC . . . . given
2. . . . . vertical angles are congruent
3. . . . . ASA postulate
4. . . . . CPCTC
