Answer:
The statement is true
Explanation:
Tightening monetary policy or curbing money supply in an economy is a move by Federal Reserve to control inflation or bring down over-heated economic growth.
Money supply is curbed by increasing short-term interest rates, thereby increasing cost of borrowing and making borrowing less attractive to public. This increase in short-term rates, also called Federal fund rates are usually greater than long-term interest rates prevailing in the market.
Answer:
The correct answer is a) investments in new facilities.
Explanation:
Business investment is the main way to obtain benefits in the short, long or medium term. For this, it is necessary to invest a certain capital in business or activities that allow the investor to increase it over time.
In the case of financial investment, capital is used to acquire securities, securities and other financial documents through which to obtain a benefit through the interest earned on them.
Answer:
The closest answer is 49.
Explanation:
Given that,
Annual demand, D = 43,000 units
Ordering cost, O = $200
Per unit cost of the item = $50
Annual holding cost, H = annual holding rate × Per unit cost of the item
= 35% × $50
= $17.5
![EOQ=\sqrt{\frac{2\times D\times O}{H} }](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=EOQ%3D%5Csqrt%7B%5Cfrac%7B2%5Ctimes%20D%5Ctimes%20O%7D%7BH%7D%20%7D)
![EOQ=\sqrt{\frac{2\times 43,000\times 200}{17.5} }](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=EOQ%3D%5Csqrt%7B%5Cfrac%7B2%5Ctimes%2043%2C000%5Ctimes%20200%7D%7B17.5%7D%20%7D)
= 991.39
= 992 units
Therefore,
Number of orders per year = Annual demand ÷ EOQ
= 43,000 ÷ 992
= 43.34
Hence, the closest answer is 49 and this is not given in the question.
Answer:
Economic integration agreement is when countries within a particular geographical area decide to remove or relax tariff or non-tariff barriers to trade between themselves and also to coordinate and harmonize their fiscal and economic policies. Free trade area is the simplest form of an economic integration; it is when governments of member countries agree to remove trade restriction between each other and when member countries are given the freedom to determine their own external trade policies towards non-members.
Supporters of free trade area argue that it is beneficial to the country based on the trade creation argument. Trade creation is where high-cost domestic production is replaced by more efficiently produced imports from within the group; that is, more expensive domestic products are replaced by lower priced imports from countries within the group. The trade creation argument is hinged on the fact that a free trade area ensures that trade is generated over and above what would otherwise have happened if there was no integration. Further, the removal of tariffs allows members to specialize in those products for which they have a comparative advantage leading to a variety of cheap imports for domestic consumers, thereby increasing living standards or welfare gains. Trade creation also creates an incentive for high cost domestic producers to cut cost so as to remain competitive thereby enhancing efficiency.
On the other hand, a free trade area is criticized on the basis of trade diversion. This is where trade with a low-cost country outside the group is influenced by higher–cost products supplied from within the group; this results in a less efficient allocation of resources as trade from outside the group is replaced by trade from within the group. Trade diversion could mean that local consumers would have to buy products at less competitive prices. Another argument would be that a free trade area would lead to a removal of tariff between member countries thereby resulting in a cessation of government revenue from tariffs. As opposed to a free trade area, free trade would increase world output and employment, raise quality and lower prices of goods as firms have access to factor inputs; it will also increase world living standards or enhances welfare gains. A free trade agreement only restricts these potential advantages to a particular geographical space.
Explanation:
Answer:
Explanation:
Answer:
$200000 + $200000 +$50000(to COLE's bonus)
= $450000
Ruby corporation uses accrual method.
A corporation that is using accrual method, cannot claim a deduction for an accrual with respect to a related party until the recipient reports that amount as income.
Here, Cole owns more than 50% (55%) so its a related party and it will report bonus on february 1,2017
Therefore, Ruby can not deduct bonus payable to oliver in 2016
Hence total deductible in 2017 would be $450000.