<span>it requires a company or individual divide resources on multiple targets rather than one. Therefore, one must use these resources more efficiently because he or she is using the same amount, usually concentrated on one target, on multiple. A company should only use this strategy if it is extremely confident in its ability to market simultaneously to multiple groups.</span>
An argument that is not against specializing in a single good in the real world is that specialization in a single good makes dumping easier and more effective.
If a country specializes in a single good, less waste will be produced and it can be dumped easily at one place and can be used or recycled more easily than to dump several different kinds of goods as they will need different technologies and to segregate them will be a hard job to do.
Countries improve their production of the commodity in which they specialize. There are many benefits to consumers if a country does so as specialization lowers the opportunity cost of production, increasing global production and lowering prices. These reduced pricing and increased supply benefit consumers.
To learn more about specialization in single good here
brainly.com/question/19018593
#SPJ4
Answer:
Jones may decide that the equity method would not be appropriate to account for the investment when Jones Company does not have significant influences over the management/operation of Sandridge Company.
Although an investors holding from 25% of investee is very much likely to have significant influences on the investee, this may not be true all over the times. For Jones, to prove that it does not have significant influences over Sandridge, there may be some following evidences:
+ Jones and Sandridge sign an agreement that Jones surrenders significant rights as a shareholder;
+ There is/are investor(s)/group(s) of investors who has more voting right than Jones and whose visionary/mission for Sandridge is opposite to Jones's.
+ Sandridge tries to reject Jones' influences on its management by seeking lawsuit or by successfully prevent representatives from Jones on its Board of Directors.
Explanation:
Answer: The price of the tied good is $27.
Explanation: The practice of tying is used to package products in such a way that the price of the tied (combined) good is closer to the buyers total willingness to pay for the two goods.
In this case, the total willingness to pay of Carnivore is $20+$7=$27
While, that of Leafygreens is $8+$12=$20
Thus, the producer will sell the combined good at $27 as it will give him more revenue.
I'd say it would be best to pay in all cash.
