It was that it didn't have a bill of rights, so I'd say "It did not protect the individual freedoms."
<span>Trade was the key in developing Britain's global empire and dominance. It opened Britain up to lucrative new markets, though which it could sell its domestically produced value-added goods (especially after the beginning of the Industrial Revolution) while importing luxury and exotic goods to drive its wealthy population. Additionally, the importance of trade and the resulting need to secure trade routes drove Britain to develop the world's most powerful navy, which in term secured its global power during its era of dominance.</span>
Answer:
After waging a successful guerrilla war against the regime of Cuban dictator Fulgencio Batista, Fidel Castro came to power on January 1, 1959. Castro was not yet a communist, and US policymakers initially took a cautious wait-and-see approach to his regime. Over the course of 1959 and 1960, US-Cuban relations worsened due to Castro’s anti-US rhetoric and radical policies, especially his refusal to hold elections. When it became clear that Castro intended to pursue an alliance with the Soviet Union, President
Explanation:
The origins of the Cuban Missile Crisis lie in the failed Bay of Pigs invasion, during which US-supported Cuban exiles hoping to foment an uprising against Castro were overpowered by the Cuban armed forces. After the invasion, Castro turned to the Soviets for protection against future US aggression. The Soviets provided Cuba with nuclear weapons on the condition that the deal would remain secret until the missiles were fully operational.^1
1
start superscript, 1, end superscript Khrushchev claimed that his motivation for providing Cuba with nuclear weaponry was to safeguard the Cuban Revolution against US aggression and to alter the global balance of power in favor of the Soviet Union.
The Louisiana Purchase was the latter, a treaty. The Constitution specifically grants the president the power to negotiate treaties which is just what Jefferson did. It is true that the Constitution does not specifically authorize Congress, let alone the executive branch, to purchase land from other nations.
