1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
STALIN [3.7K]
3 years ago
5

Which group describes results of the California gold rush?

History
2 answers:
hoa [83]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Group A describes the results of the California gold rush, as due to it food was scarce, disease was widespread, the population became diverse, and Levis were invented.

Explanation:

The California gold rush was the large-scale, stormy migration of people from all over the world to California, which arose after gold was found there on January 24, 1848, and lasted until 1856.

Initially, rumors of the gold discovery only spread in the southwestern United States, and the influx of people who were triggered by gold fever to the site was limited to thousands. After a year, reports about the gold fields spread around the world and the gold rush reached a volume of hundreds of thousands of gold diggers. Their journey lasted for months, was tough and cost many lives. Once in California, they found an area where lawlessness prevailed, so that they had to organize their claim rights themselves. Gradually the gold became more difficult to win and laws and measures were introduced that were aimed at foreigners. From 1856, substantial investments were needed in mining equipment, which meant that only large companies were able to continue mining and dried up the influx of fortune seekers.

When the gold rush started, San Francisco was a small settlement. The city became an important gateway to the mining areas and grew explosively. Numerous new settlements arose around the gold fields. From 1848 to 1856, more than 300,000 people migrated to California and an estimated 340,000 kilos of gold were mined there. The number of Indians fell from 150,000 to 50,000 in that period and gold mining caused a lot of environmental damage. The California gold rush had global economic consequences and contributed to California becoming the 31st state of America in 1850.

kozerog [31]3 years ago
6 0

Group A describes results of the California gold rush

You might be interested in
What were some economic reasons for westward expansion in the united states?
Pani-rosa [81]
There were many economy reasons for expanding. When you have more land you profit more. There would also more opportunity with more land.
7 0
3 years ago
50 POINTS AND BRAINIEST TO WHOEVER GET IT RIGHT!!! In the excerpt from The Odyssey: A Graphic Novel, the author uses a splash as
tankabanditka [31]

Answer: the correct answer is C

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the gentleman’s agreement
PtichkaEL [24]

A gentlemen's agreement or gentleman's agreement is an informal and legally non-binding agreement between two or more parties. It is typically oral, though it may be written, or simply understood as part of an unspoken agreement by convention or through mutually beneficial etiquette. The essence of a gentlemen's agreement is that it relies upon the honor of the parties for its fulfillment, rather than being in any way enforceable. It is, therefore, distinct from a legal agreement or contract, which can be enforced if necessary

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Civil liberties are related to which fundamental kind of rights?
svet-max [94.6K]

The correct answer choice would be B.

Hope this helps and thanks for using brainly!

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Many people, like Nader and Buchanan, opposed the ratification of NAFTA. How might that have influenced what Clinton said in his
Ugo [173]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

During the times of NAFTA, the North America Free Trade Agreement between México, Canada, and the United States, many people opposed the treaty and questioned President Bill Clinton about it.

Nader and Buchanan opposed the ratification of NAFTA. This influenced what Clinton said in his speech of September 14, 1993. On that day, President Clinton signed two supplements that were included in the Free Trade Agreement.

President Clinton’s speech addressed the arguments against NAFTA that Nader and Buchanan made in that hehe said it was not true that the trade meant just moving out jobs from the US to México. And he clearly explained that Mexicans with lower income than Germans or Europeans spent more in US products, more than those Europeans and Canadians.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • HELP PLS!!!!
    14·1 answer
  • Are suicide bombings related to religious fundamentalism?
    14·1 answer
  • In what way did the doughboys show great personal bravery?
    9·2 answers
  • Jose needs to memorize words on a vocabulary list for German class. He has 24 words to memorize, and he is two-thirds done. How
    10·1 answer
  • Why is the spanish civil war significant in this time period ?
    13·1 answer
  • Do you agree with the American government's decision to declare war against Japan? why or why not
    6·1 answer
  • Which of these makes up the largest part of the money supply in the United States?
    9·1 answer
  • What is opium? Why was it valuable for the British?
    13·1 answer
  • The colonist slogan no taxation without representation express a belief in ?
    11·2 answers
  • Please paki answer po​
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!