All categories

4 years ago

The supreme Court case Worcester v. Georgia was a small victory for the Cherokee Nation in Georgia because it

2 answers:

8 0

The Supreme Court case Worcester v. Georgia was a small victory for the Cherokee Nation in Georgia because it struck down the laws created by the Georgian legislature.

Further Explanation:

Worcester V Georgia (1832) abandoned the judgement of Samuel Worcester by Supreme Court. It also held the Georgia criminal statute which was forbidding non-Native Americans to live on Americans native land without license. It was unconstitutional.

Samuel Austin Worcester was translator of Bible, protector of the Cherokee'ssovereignty and a missionary to Cherokee He made collaboration with Elias Boudinot to establish the Cherokee Phoenix, first American newspaper in vernacular language. Migration of European American settlers from coastal areas towards Cherokee territory even after making land cessions to the US government became prevalent. Worchester and his sponsor plotted to fight against the encroachment through court. They even want to take the case to the Supreme Court to explain the relation between the federal and the state government to establish the sovereignty of Cherokee nation.

Ex- U.S Attorney General, William Writ argued their position in US Supreme court. Cherokee Nation was described as a domestic dependent nation with no authority binding on a state by Chief Justice Marshall.

Worcester along with other eleven missionaries protested and published a resolution against the Georgia Law in1830 forbidding white men from living on the land of America without state license. According to the Worcester by obeying this law they will be compromising their sovereignty. After implementation of the law, Worcester and many others were charged for disobeying the law. They refuse to get the license.

Learn more:

1. DoesSupreme Court ruled in William Furman’s favor, saying that Georgia had in Furman v. Georgia (1972)? brainly.com/question/2816742

2. The Supreme Court is best characterized as?brainly.com/question/407715

Answer Details:

Grade: High school

Subject: US History

Chapter: Georgia Legislature

Keywords: Worcester V Georgia, Samuel Worcester, Supreme Court, Georgia, Native American, Samuel Austin Worcester, Cherokee’s sovereignty, Elias Boudinot, Cherokee Phoenix, U.S Attorney General, William Writ

inysia [295]4 years ago

5 0

Answer: B. struck down laws created by the Georgia legislature to seize Cherokee lands

Explanation: The decision in Worcester v. Georgia was a small victory for the Cherokee Nation because it struck down laws created by the Georgia legislature to seize Cherokee lands. Judge John Marshall wrote that the Indian Nations were independent political communities entitled to their own natural rights.

You might be interested in

The national government and the state governments have the power to establish....

kotegsom [21]

Both the national and the state governments share the power to establish courts.

Hope this helped!

7 0

3 years ago

After the battle of the Marne in 1914, German forces realized that victory…

garik1379 [7]

Answer:

A. Would be theirs, as long as they stuck to the plan.

<h2>Why was the Battle of the Marne significant in history?</h2>

It's rather a case of right place, right time. The German flanking plan, known as the Schleiffen Plan, was largely misunderstood by the French in their initial maneuvers, leaving an unlocked rear door.

When it was evident that the axis of progress through Belgium was the major German effort and the German goals were known, Joffre repositioned his forces to counter this assault. Joffre made smart tactical choices as he retired to the Marne's positions. Shortening communication and supply lines while reorganizing dispersed troops are all benefits of a well-planned retreat.

In order to destroy the French army in detail, Moltke must move to fight them while simultaneously expanding his administrative lines. However, he cannot push on Paris while the French army is still in tact just off to the left.

Joffre doesn't now need to annihilate the German army; all he needs to do is keep them out of Paris and the coast of the English Channel. The point is that Joffre can't defeat the Germans in a decisive battle, but if he keeps them there or, better yet, drives them onto territory that will allow for a thorough and German-evicting counterattack, the time he buys will sap his opponent's material strength while he gains more every day from the UK and foreign Colonial forces.

3 0

2 years ago

How did the triangular trade benefit Europeans?

makvit [3.9K]

Europeans were able to trade in a more efficient way. it made it easier for them to trade slaves and other items from Africa to American colonies to Europe

8 0

4 years ago

¿Qué es el maximato?

kifflom [539]

Idkhhhmksbbdbdbdbbdjdnnsh d a. Send x

6 0

3 years ago

what was the condition of greece that made it easy for philip ii to conquer almost all the greek city-states?

lys-0071 [83]

Answer:

Greece was divided and weak because of the Peloponnesian War.

______________________

Explanation:

I got it from my quizlet.

______________________

Hope this helps!!!

-GXLDIE <3

7 0

3 years ago