All categories

4 years ago

The supreme Court case Worcester v. Georgia was a small victory for the Cherokee Nation in Georgia because it

2 answers:

8 0

The Supreme Court case Worcester v. Georgia was a small victory for the Cherokee Nation in Georgia because it struck down the laws created by the Georgian legislature.

Further Explanation:

Worcester V Georgia (1832) abandoned the judgement of Samuel Worcester by Supreme Court. It also held the Georgia criminal statute which was forbidding non-Native Americans to live on Americans native land without license. It was unconstitutional.

Samuel Austin Worcester was translator of Bible, protector of the Cherokee'ssovereignty and a missionary to Cherokee He made collaboration with Elias Boudinot to establish the Cherokee Phoenix, first American newspaper in vernacular language. Migration of European American settlers from coastal areas towards Cherokee territory even after making land cessions to the US government became prevalent. Worchester and his sponsor plotted to fight against the encroachment through court. They even want to take the case to the Supreme Court to explain the relation between the federal and the state government to establish the sovereignty of Cherokee nation.

Ex- U.S Attorney General, William Writ argued their position in US Supreme court. Cherokee Nation was described as a domestic dependent nation with no authority binding on a state by Chief Justice Marshall.

Worcester along with other eleven missionaries protested and published a resolution against the Georgia Law in1830 forbidding white men from living on the land of America without state license. According to the Worcester by obeying this law they will be compromising their sovereignty. After implementation of the law, Worcester and many others were charged for disobeying the law. They refuse to get the license.

Learn more:

1. DoesSupreme Court ruled in William Furman’s favor, saying that Georgia had in Furman v. Georgia (1972)? brainly.com/question/2816742

2. The Supreme Court is best characterized as?brainly.com/question/407715

Answer Details:

Grade: High school

Subject: US History

Chapter: Georgia Legislature

Keywords: Worcester V Georgia, Samuel Worcester, Supreme Court, Georgia, Native American, Samuel Austin Worcester, Cherokee’s sovereignty, Elias Boudinot, Cherokee Phoenix, U.S Attorney General, William Writ

inysia [295]4 years ago

5 0

Answer: B. struck down laws created by the Georgia legislature to seize Cherokee lands

Explanation: The decision in Worcester v. Georgia was a small victory for the Cherokee Nation because it struck down laws created by the Georgia legislature to seize Cherokee lands. Judge John Marshall wrote that the Indian Nations were independent political communities entitled to their own natural rights.

You might be interested in

Which theory is most closely associated with john locke

Maru [420]

Answer:

The Social Contract Theory

Explanation:

The ethical questions of the price and the wage arent unique to work/labor theories of the value. These ethical questions have been closely associated with Locke and the labor theory of value in both the economics and political philosophy literature. Hope This Helps!

3 0

3 years ago

what geographic feature is located in the rocky moutains and determines the directional flow of rivers in north america

Vesna [10]

The continental divide is the geographic feature located in the Rocky mountains. It determines the directional flow of rivers in North America and it follows at a high elevation.

4 0

3 years ago

What happened near the city of Tours in 711?

LenKa [72]

Answer:

a combined Arab and Berber army invaded Spain and quickly conquered it.

Explanation:

5 0

3 years ago

How was the nullification crisis of 1833 resolved

Zielflug [23.3K]

The nullification crisis was resolved when Congress revised the tariff that had caused South Carolina to declare nullification; then, the state was able to accept the compromise without losing their respect and pride. However, the nullification crisis would not be fully resolved until the Civil War, when the national government left dual federalism and entered into cooperative federalism, thereby limiting the state's power to challenge the national government's authority.

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Describe the policy of appeasement and it emboldened Hitler leading up to World War II

ki77a [65]

The policy of appeasement is when one governing body gives into another in efforts to avoid a confrontation. During the 1930's, both France and England saw what Nazi Germany was doing but they were under great pressure to not go back to war as their countries had hardly recovered from WWI. They understood Germany had grievances from the first WW and some even admired Hitler's patriotism for his country not recognizing his fascism ideals. The committee decided to let Hitler have Czech. but he wanted all of Europe so he could have room for his people to expand. The committee let him have all the resources of Czech. but he took Slovakia and the Ukraine. Hitler thought no one was going to do anything so he just kept taking countries. Finally, after Hitler took Poland, Chamberlain of England had to say this was an act of aggression and a call for war. By giving in a little each time to Hitler it was like feeding a growing monster. By the time the major leaders woke up to the fact that appeasement wasn't going to work, a major dilemma had developed for Europe.

4 0

4 years ago