According to Gerhard Lenski, the growth of the middle class reduces the polarization between the owning and the working class.
In Gerhard Lenski's theory of inequality, he explained that in the society, some people are going to have a surplus of goods in the society. While other people would not be so lucky to have the same.
According to him, social inequality would arise due to the fact that some people are going to have more bargaining power than other people that are in the society.
Read more on brainly.com/question/6782117?referrer=searchResults
Answer:
Well, it's like with Suffragettes, a group of women fighting for the rights of women, well it's not completely like it, however, with the fight for women's rights, society had created a certain mindset, that women were a weaker sex, and that all and any of their value came with how the men saw them, they had no rights and they were thought of to need men. With Slavery, society had created a certain mind set that most people no longer hold, they believed that people of colour were lower than them, that they didn't deserve to have rights. The dehumanized them like they did with people from India, and as they dehumanized the slaves, it was easier for them to be able to treat them so poorly. Society had created this view and everyone else agreed. It was to help themselves and take over. Not to mention that Glory, Gold and Land was so important back then, people really didn't care about others, if they felt like someone wasn't of their status, they treated them poorly. Just like in Harry Potter, the purebloods had all gotten this ideology that they were better than anyone less than them, they taught their children and acted on their beliefs.
Explanation:
I think the correct answer is
The last statement
4) You do what you are supposed to do.
Answer:
C. A hurricane is likely to make landfall in the next 24 hours.
Explanation:
Answer:
B) negatively correlated.
Explanation:
The case is set, would reflect a negative correlation between wealth and marital satisfaction.
This means that not necessarily the wealth would cause marriages to report higher levels of happiness or satisfaction. This would imply that there is an inverse relationship between two variables - when one variable decreases, the other increases. So to the contrary, it would mean the opposite. Having less money would favor marital satisfaction.
It is so believed that money issues are important variables so, they should be reconsidered. In the case as stated having more money turns into less satisfaction of the pair.
A example that is similar to this as a negative correlation, is the birth of children, and mariage, since the condition creates stress that the new creature poses to the relationship between the pair, that was often better treated.
