Answer:
Podemos distinguir si algo es bueno o malo moralment basandonos en nuestros actos y las consequencias de ellos. Algo sera bueno cuando este de acuerdo con dichas normas, y malo cuando este en desacuerdo.
<span>Early behaviorists such as john b. Watson would have considered the introspective study of self-esteem to be: </span><span>An unscientific Method
In introspective study, the data i gathered by the subjects themselves by trying to analyze their own psychological components. This will make the data that collected become extremely biased and unreliable.</span>
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although the question does not have any statements or options, we can say that the Supreme Court's rationale for the decision in McDonald v Chicago was that the Court reversed the decision made by the 7th. Circuit, explaining that the 14th Amendment to the US Constitution supports the right including in the 2nd Amendment to have weapons for the self-protection of the citizen in all the states of the Union. So yes, the 2nd. Amendment to the United States Constitution applies to the states. The case McDonald v Chicago was decided on June 18, 2010.
Technolgy influenced many variables throughout time, such as imperial expansion, knowledge of the environment, better medical development, and many other things. If we didn't have the technological advancements that we did throughout the ages, the world would be very different from today. Many things could have gone astray and history would be very different. For example, if boats were never invented, immigration and exploration would be almost non-existent, and the Americas wouldn't have been discovered by Europe. Another thing that would have changed is international trade, trading between countries would be impossible without the use of boats unless the countries were connected by land.
Hope this helps :)
