<span>There's not really any pros for propaganda because essentially what you are doing is lying to get someone to believe something. I guess you could say a pro is that gullible people will believe you, but that's an unethical pro. The cons are that it usually causes much controversy in a society where there's not supposed to be a bias in the government. Propaganda in its true form is never a good thing. It is unethical in the sense that it takes advantage of people who are too lazy to do research and quick to believe what someone tells them. One example I like to use is many of these independent "news" websites. On both ends of the political spectrum, left and right, you find websites that have articles so heavily weighed down with that wings propaganda that true news becomes less and less visible. Occupy Democrats is one textbook example of that. Their articles are so left leaning that you read an article and are immediately left with a left leaning impression. Same goes for a lot of right wing websites. I'm not going to say "always" but propaganda 99.9 percent of the time is not good. Instead of people doing their own research to decide their view on something, propaganda </span>tells<span> people what they should think versus the </span><span>asking </span><span>people what they think</span>
He ruled one fifth of the world's inhabited land.He was also the first non-native emperor to conquer all of China.
Answer:
The correct answer is:
e)All of the above
Explanation:
In general, scientific research is based in an skeptikal point of view, therefore all the answers are included in the answer to this question due to the fact that a scientific research has to be tested several times in order to confirm its validity and reliability. Besides, it is also necessary to make sure, especially when the experiment involves products or treatments that are wanted to be released in a direct contact with the social context, they have to be tested several types by others in different conditions under several analisis and points of view. Finally, not only one or few scientists are due to prove the answers are the best currently possible, but many of them must certify the information about it.
The idea of citizenship has expanded to include all people who fulfill certain criteria, and in principle anyone can obtain a citizenship of many countries if they work towards it thought the process of naturalization.
In the past, citizenship was often limited: it included only men (as in ancient Greece) or only certain ethic groups (as in the case of Early US).
Answer:
Invalid and insufficient reasoning
Explanation:
This can also be referred to as fallacious reasoning if the reasoning is false claims.
