Answer:
In addition to the drain of silver, by 1838 the number of Chinese opium addicts had grown to between four and 12 million and the Daoguang Emperor demanded action. Officials at the court who advocated legalizing and taxing the trade were defeated by those who advocated suppressing it. The Emperor sent the leader of the hard line faction, Special Imperial Commissioner Lin Zexu, to Canton, where he quickly arrested Chinese opium dealers and summarily demanded that foreign firms turn over their stocks with no compensation. When they refused, Lin stopped trade altogether and placed the foreign residents under virtual siege in their factories. The British Superintendent of Trade in China Charles Elliot got the British traders to agree to hand over their opium stock with the promise of eventual compensation for their loss from the British government. While this amounted to a tacit acknowledgment that the British government did not disapprove of the trade, it also placed a huge liability on the exchequer. This promise and the inability of the British government to pay it without causing a political storm was an important casus belli for the subsequent British offensive.
Hello there!
One thing that Thomas really wanted to demand for sure without fail was actually (no taxation without representation). If you had NO representation in this kind of matter, then, most likely you wouldn't have to deal with tax. But if it was the opposite, this after ward,you would need to handle the responsibility with tax.
The best sentence to modify or refute the answer given to this question is to introduce the African-American slaves who worked the plantations, as shown in option A.
We can arrive at this answer because:
- The question “What then is the American, this new man?” is answered by showing that the American is the European or the descendant of European, that he lives in America with the freedom to be what he wants, to relate to what he wants and to be the owner of the land where he works.
- Although this answer represents part of the Americans, it is not a correct answer, as not all Americans experience this reality.
- The author did not consider the African-Americans who had their freedom impeded by slavery and did not own their lands, but who worked to maintain the survival of Europeans and their descendants, without receiving a penny in return.
In that case, by questioning the plight of enslaved African Americans, we can refute the author's response about what it is to be an American.
This question is related to "Letters from an American Farmer."
You can find more information about slavery at the link:
brainly.com/question/5188506
Answer:
What is their main cause for running and what do they want for the country?
Explanation:
