George Washington is the answer
Answer:
The correct option is;
C) Resented the limits it imposed on westward expansion
Explanation:
The Proclamation intended to protect the colonist from rampages by the Indians and also to protect Native Americans from attacks with measures including the ban on purchase of land from the natives by private individuals and restrict travel and trade into the west to only licensed traders and prevented westward colonial expansion past Appalachia
The proclamation was put to effect on the 7th of October 1763.
Proponents claimed the acts were designed to protect the United States from alien citizens of enemy powers and to stop seditious attacks from weakening the government
credit to: answers.yahoo.com
1. It encourages international cooperation.
- true!
It
leads to peaceful resolutions of international
conflicts. - well, a bit, but only as an extension of the frist thing- so the frist one is a better option!
It protects fragile ecosystems. - nothing to do with that!
It provides jobs for workers
in developed nations. - not, rather in the developing nation
Which is an argument against free trade?
It can limit environmental protection measures. - i don't think this is a very good option, but its the best of those given. Let's say that one country prohibits production which is enviromentally harmful, but cheap: a free trade would challenge this deciosn.
It leads to
international conflict. - no, i don't think so
It increases the prices for many products. -no, it rather decreases
It
violates basic economic principles.
- no, i don't think si