The 1973 oil crisis began in October 1973 when the members of the Organization of Arab Petroleum Exporting Countries proclaimed an oil embargo. The embargo was targeted at nations perceived as supporting Israel during the Yom Kippur War.[1] The initial nations targeted were Canada, Japan, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom and the United States with the embargo also later extended to Portugal, Rhodesia and South Africa. By the end of the embargo in March 1974,[2] the price of oil had risen from US$3 per barrel to nearly $12 globally; US prices were significantly higher. The embargo caused an oil crisis, or "shock", with many short- and long-term effects on global politics and the global economy.[3] It was later called the "first oil shock", followed by the 1979 oil crisis, termed the "second oil shock."
Answer:It’s not letting me help but I think it’s C
Explanation: 12+9=21 this is your answer
Answer:
b) focusing on quantity over quality
Explanation:
Participation has to do with including other people in a task to achieve a common goal.
Being a team player is an effective participation strategy because it means you include other people by asking for their views, input, ideas, and effort.
Engaging in meaningful conversations is another effective participation strategy because one is sharing ideas and rubbing minds with others in order to get a job done.
The option that is NOT an effective participation strategy is choosing quantity over quality because this shows that one does not value quality but instead chooses to do more, even if they are of lesser quality and this suggest that a team involvement is not really valued.
Answer:
The ammendment that describes and settles this scenario :
At a gun collecting show, George Samuels picked out 13 guns that he wanted to add to his expensive collection of guns from the 1800s. When he tried to pay for the 13 guns he was told by a security guard that he wasn't allowed to take so many guns. The security guard would only allow George to buy 5 guns because the Constitution allows citizens to have one gun per family member.
Is:
The second ammendment.
Explanation:
The second amendment of the United States of America constitution protects the right of bearing and keeping guns. Justified by the natural right to resist against oppression and the civic duty to act in concern of defense to the state. Nevertheless, the federal constitution doesn't set a limit in the number of guns someone can own. However, states do set limits.
