Countries sign laws and treaties to protect different species. There is enough funding to supply the enforcement needed

2 answers:

7 0

This statement is false.
Unfortunately, there isn't enough funding to supply the enforcement needed to make these laws and treaties legal and applicable. Every year, there are so many new laws and treaties signed in order to protect various species, however, often there isn't enough money to actually enforce them which is why most of them never become laws.

Juliette [100K]3 years ago

3 0

That is false. Countries sign laws and treaties to protect different species. There is not enough funding to supply the enforcement needed.

You might be interested in

The US government outlawed the Ghost Dance, which Native Americans had resorted to in hopes of

EastWind [94]

Hello,

The answer is <span>b.
restoring their lost way of life

Hope this helps</span>

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

You found waterlogged ammunition and need to request a disposition. What information do you send to the designated disposal auth

Mariana [72]

The information that you have to send to the designated disposal authority is the explanation of the circumstances and regulatory status statement.

<h3>What is the designated disposal authority?</h3>

This is the body that is in charge of disposing obsolete and unserviceable government owned weapons and ammunitions.

An authorized military personnel is the one that can say the state of a waste military material.

Read more on ammunitions here: brainly.com/question/7773692

DDAs provide disposition instructions for excess, obsolete, and unserviceable government-owned ammunition items and components that need to be

3 0

2 years ago

Which is NOT a role of the president?

strojnjashka [21]

I believe the correct answers are Head of State and Chief Justice. hope this helps, have an amazing day :)

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

How many Chinese people support the nationalists at the beginning of the twentieth century

Jobisdone [24]

Because they belived the Manchos Dynasty had lost the Mandate of Heaven

4 0

2 years ago

you take a position on whether or not robots can replace real animals as pets. Give evidence why you choose what you choose

andrey2020 [161]

Answer:

I would say that robots should not take the place of animals because some robots can malfunction and some thing can happen like exsplod or even worse but animals should not be replaced because that could make an person lazy like if the robot doesn't have to use the rest room or some thing then the human would not like getting out to extra size with the real dog and just stay in the house all day.

Explanation:

hey i hop this helped make sure to change up my words a little when you write it down so it doesn't look like copy write ok

7 0

2 years ago