1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
dimaraw [331]
3 years ago
13

During the 1930s, an increase in crime was the result of several things, including

History
2 answers:
klemol [59]3 years ago
8 0
I believe the answer is C. Poverty because during this time there was the Great Depression
MAVERICK [17]3 years ago
8 0
Poverty is the answer
You might be interested in
What were andrew johnson policies concerning the rights of African Americans?
Lelu [443]

for the most part, historians view Andrew Johnson as the worst possible person to have served as President at the end of the American Civil War. Because of his gross incompetence in federal office and his incredible miscalculation of the extent of public support for his policies, Johnson is judged as a great failure in making a satisfying and just peace. He is viewed to have been a rigid, dictatorial racist who was unable to compromise or to accept a political reality at odds with his own ideas. Instead of forging a compromise between Radical Republicans and moderates, his actions united the opposition against him. His bullheaded opposition to the Freedmen's Bureau Bill, the Civil Rights Act of 1866, and the Fourteenth Amendment eliminated all hope of using presidential authority to affect further compromises favorable to his position. In the end, Johnson did more to extend the period of national strife than he did to heal the wounds of war.

Most importantly, Johnson's strong commitment to obstructing political and civil rights for blacks is principally responsible for the failure of Reconstruction to solve the race problem in the South and perhaps in America as well. Johnson's decision to support the return of the prewar social and economic system—except for slavery—cut short any hope of a redistribution of land to the freed people or a more far-reaching reform program in the South.

Historians naturally wonder what might have happened had Lincoln, a genius at political compromise and perhaps the most effective leader to ever serve as President, lived. Would African Americans have obtained more effective guarantees of their civil rights? Would Lincoln have better completed what one historian calls the "unfinished revolution" in racial justice and equality begun by the Civil War? Almost all historians believe that the outcome would have been far different under Lincoln's leadership.

Among historians, supporters of Johnson are few in recent years. However, from the 1870s to around the time of World War II, Johnson enjoyed high regard as a strong-willed President who took the courageous high ground in challenging Congress's unconstitutional usurpation of presidential authority. In this view, much out of vogue today, Johnson is seen to have been motivated by a strict constructionist interpretation of the Constitution and by a firm belief in the separation of powers. This perspective reflected a generation of historians who were critical of Republican policy and skeptical of the viability of racial equality as a national policy. Even here, however, apologists for Johnson acknowledge his inability to effectively deal with congressional challenges due to his personal limitations as a leader.

7 0
3 years ago
To bring water to fields and crops
Anastaziya [24]

Irrigation is what brings water to fields and crops.

Hope this helps!

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Question 7
RUDIKE [14]

Answer:

True

Explanation:

Whatever you decide will affect the rest of your life, whether positively or negatively.

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
URGET PLEASE ANSWER ASAP Where is Venice on the map?
Yakvenalex [24]

Answer:

B

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
1. Who were the two countries fighting one another in the war?
julia-pushkina [17]

Answer:

None of them

Explanation:

France and Britain were allies, so they were fighting together

Netherlands and Spain were neutral countries, meaning they were not involved in the war

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why did lincoln send a ship to fort sumter in april 1861?union troops had been attacked by the confederacy. union troops had run
    12·2 answers
  • How does North Korea’s economy differ from the economy of Canada? A. North Korea’s economy relies on nuclear weapons while Canad
    14·2 answers
  • By 661AD, what areas of land did the Islamic Empire include?
    10·1 answer
  • What is the most important fundamental principles of our government?
    15·1 answer
  • What invention led Japan to surrender to the Allies in September 1945?
    9·1 answer
  • How many jews really died in the holocaust?
    9·1 answer
  • 6. Why did immigrants turn to political machines?
    10·2 answers
  • The economic effect on the civiHow did Presidential Reconstruction allow black codes to be passed?
    13·1 answer
  • Legislative salaries are determined by:
    11·1 answer
  • Write about a time when you had a problem. What was the problem? What did you do to solve it?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!