To learn how people are searching online, a keyword analysis would be most relevant.
Answer:
As in her worthless note,Sandy has a zero adjusted basis. Her bad debt deduction is Nil according to Section 166 (b).
Section 166(g)(1) states that her capital loss realized on the deemed sale of this stoke is also nil because of zero adjusted basis in her worthless stock.
According to Reg. Sec.1.1366-2(a)(5) if all of her stock is disposed by an S corporation shareholder and loss carryforward attributable to the Section 1366 (d) basis. Limitaitons are permanently disaalowed.
Hence, her $7,400 ordinary loss carryforward can never be deducted by Sandy.
Sandy has no 2012 tax consequences from worthlessness of her Lindlee investments
First, we take into account the benefit and cost given in the problem. The benefit, which is $2 is a dollar lesser compared to the cost that would be incurred should the business opt to produce one more roast beef. This, of course, tells us that an additional roast beef will just impose an additional $1 cost. Thus, the answer should be the last choice.
Fred will either have to pay more than he proposed or Barney would be able to open his business in the same city
