Answer:
Indeed, a large number of lawsuits enter the American courts year after year. This happens for two main factors:
-First, there is absolute trust in the judicial system of the United States. The citizens trust in the absolute transparency and impartiality of the judges, with which they do not hesitate to go to them to resolve their controversies. Furthermore, the relatively short resolution and sentencing time means that this method is not seen as a waste of time.
-Second, there is a clear lack of communication when doing business. In other words, a culture of judicialization of conflicts has been generated, which means that many controversies that can be resolved privately between the parties end up being the subject of a trial, which saturates the judicial system and breaks trust between the parts.
The responsibility in this matter belongs to the entire society: it is necessary to resume the path of dialogue and joint conflict resolution, instead of going to an impartial third party to do so. The mentality must be changed to achieve a culture of communication that favors joint solutions to society's problems.
Unfortunately, this process takes years and years of education and a change in culture, so that in the coming years a significant change in the number of lawsuits filed in this country should not be expected.
The given situation is a prime example of federal violations of First Amendment rights.
Option A
<u>Explanation:
</u>
The First provision to the Rule of law of the United States of America prevents the Government from making laws governing religious establishments, restricting freedom of religion or shortening freedom of expression, freedom of the press, the right to peacefully assemble and the right of request to the Government to rectify any complaints It was approved as one of the ten changes to the Constitution on 15 December 1791.
The best examples demonstrate a contravention of someone's First Amendment rights that is the fighting-related news journalists embedded in. The news reports may not disclose first of all the War of the First Amendment.
Answer:
b. Credit to Fair value adjustment for $5,000
Explanation:
Particulars Amount
Beginning balance of fair value adjustment $20,000
Less: Unrealized gain on Dec 31, year 3 <u>$15,000</u> ($515,000-$500,000)
Credit to Fair value adjustment <u>$5,000</u>
So, Credit to Fair value adjustment for $5,000 will be included in the related journal entry dated December 31, Year 3.
Answer and Explanation:
a. The computation is shown below;
Cash bonus after tax is ($3,000 × (1 - 0.24) $2,280
And, non taxable fringe benefit is $2,300
So here he should use the nontaxable fringe benefit
b. Yes answer would be changed
Cash bonus after tax is ($3,000 × (1 - 0.12) $2,640
And, non taxable fringe benefit is $2,300
hence, the same is to be considered
