Answer and Explanation:
<u>Zaroff and Rainsford are characters in Richard Connell's short story "The Most Dangerous Game". The whole story revolves around what is moral and what is not, as well as the characters' ability to empathize with others.</u>
It is interesting to notice that Rainsford and Zaroff are more similar than they are different. They are both skilled hunters who also happen to be quite arrogant about their profession. Both fail to empathize with their prey. However, this is where the difference begins and ends.<u> Rainsford hunts wild animals. </u>He does not think of a jaguar's feelings when he fires his gun to kill it.
<u>Zaroff, on the other hand, hunts men. </u>He knows very well he is hunting rational beings like himself. But he does not care. He sees the men he hunts as inferior to him, just like Rainsford sees the animals as mere huntees. Yet, <u>Rainsford is incapable of condoning with Zaroff's behavior and perception. To Rainsford, what Zaroff does is pure muder.</u>
<u>This tension and the conflict this difference generates are what advances the plot. Both hunters have similar views, only one of them has taken it to the next level. Is only Zaroff wrong? Are both of them murderers? Is Rainsford a better men simply because he has a different sense of moral when it comes to other human beings, but no moral when it comes to animals? Thus, the moral stakes of the story make us wonder and question the characters.</u>
Answer: Intro- China's water pollution is a result of industrial wastewater discharges, untreated domestic sewage and nonpoint source pollution mainly from agriculture.As China's surface waters are increasingly polluted, not surprisingly its groundwater supplies have been increasingly exploited, particularly in the North.
Explanation: Hope u like the intro and to me about what ur teacher is telling you is that to not put ur opinon(sorry if that sounds rude) in it like make it sound like ur a machin thats writing it if that makes sense sorry im a little bit bad at explaining things
Answer:
I believe the answer is "It represents the mixing of two cultures"
Explanation:
When Iron Shell found the piece of iron and was confused about the meaning and wasn't sure why a white mans possession would be of importance to him. When Iron shell went to the boarding school he resented the white people and did not want to have anything to do with the place or people because white men were of his culture's enemy. He realizes that the piece of iron led him to be a black smith and work with the white man's iron. So in the end Iron Shell had mixed his culture with the white man's culture by being black smith, and the iron shell piece is what led him there.
Grover Underwood and annabeth
