Answer:
The option which weaken the conclusion drawn is:
E. All artists who receive grants and donations are completely dependent on that money to cover their daily expenses; without those funds, they would have to discontinue the practice of their art.
Explanation:
The conclusion drawn in the passage is that grants and donations are a bad things because they actually make artists lose the interest for work. The passage claims that artists only practice art because they need to survive.
<u>The option that weakens that conclusion is the one that goes against it. In that case, we should choose letter E, since it claims the opposite. It states that artists need the money they receive in the form of grants and donations. If they cannot cover their expenses, they cannot work. If grants and donations help them cove their expenses, they are able to work. Therefore, letter E is the best option.</u>
They already had Britain as an example as what to do and had Britain's inventions so they didn't need to invent anything, just use the inventions Britain thought of
<span>The law of soil (also known as "Jus Soli") is when an offspring is born in the U.S., they are granted citizenship.
The law of blood (also known as "Jus Sanguinis") is when an offspring of an American citizen, you are a natural born U.S. citizen.</span>
There<span> are more than 6.5 billion people in the </span>world today. Nearly 2/3 of them are Asians living on less than 1/3 of the land. Only about 5% of theworld's<span> people live in North America. Just </span>how many<span> different societies,</span>cultures<span>, and ethnic groups make up the </span>world<span>'s population is not certain</span>
Watson is to behaviorism as Rodgers is to psychology