The statement is "True".
It is normal, when tuning in to another person talk, to
figure an answer while the other individual is as yet talking. This implies the
individual is not by any stretch of the imagination tuning in to all that is
being said. Even good audience members are regularly blameworthy of
fundamentally assessing what is being said before completely understanding the
message that the speaker is attempting to convey. The outcome is that
suspicions are made and conclusions came to about the speaker's implying that
may be incorrect.
One legislation that harmed a minority group would be,
The Zero-Tolerance Laws
Answer:
Bishop Bossuet <em>believes</em> that the king will be a <em>father to the kingdom </em>and the king should look after everyone in the kingdom, so he <em>took a strong stand on Divine Right kings.
</em>
<u>Explanation:
</u>
Bishop Bossuet was a great priest during the time of <em>Louis XIV</em>. Bossuet argued with the government that the government was eternal and the kings received powers from god. He believes that the king looks after all the people because king is the father.
Bossuet says that this government is most natural, most common and most ancient form of government. All countries are ruled by the kings we he says that <em>whenever there is another form of the government it loses good qualities and leads to the society without any authorities.</em> These led Bishop Bossuet powerful belief on Divine Right kings.
By working in the city-state and contributing to the economy of the city.
A bargain is considered to be void if a court has judged a person to be mentally incompetent at time that the bargain was formed.
