Answer:
Dissenters
Explanation:
The term dissenters was widely used in 17th and 18th centuries. Generally, these dissenters were only a group of people that opposed the states' intervention to personal religious matters. (At that time, England wanted the church to be heavily involved in all political decisions).
But, many church officials at that time blatantly categorized these dissenters as someone who oppose the church and Christianity as a whole to diminish public support for them.
Answer:
It is not about plantations or being racits for may it was about not ceceding to Nationalism. Many Southernist believed in an idealism known as sectionalism. This meant that they believed that they wanted the state government to have more power than the national government. Many also believed that the industrial growth that the North wanted to persue was not the best option, because many in the South wanted to continue the economy on another path through farming.
Explanation:
Answer:
is supposed to keep the government small and keep the government from violating our god-given rights keep us free from invasions and allow the citizens of each state to participate in government. what it is supposed to do for the state is coordinate them facilitate inteaction among them make sure each date is treated fairly and give each state a voice in the federal government unfortunately since the Constitution is not following very well these days to a great degree those in government are allowing it to do its job that's why we are in such a mess in Washington
<span>Freedom of speech is a bellweather: how any society tolerates those with minority, disfavored, or even obnoxious views will often speak to its performance on human rights more generally. In international law, access to information and free expression are two sides of the same coin, and both have found tremendous accelerators in the Internet and other forms of digital communication. At the same time, efforts to control speech and information are also accelerating, by both governments and private actors in the form of censorship, restrictions on access, and violent acts directed against those whose views or queries are seen as somehow dangerous or wrong. From our earliest days, when we were called The Fund for Free Expression, we have fought all forms of repression of speech, in all media, around the globe.</span>
