Answer: See explanation
Explanation:
Based on the information given, we should note that the bond will trade at par at $1000 after six month
The holding period return will be:
= [ P1 - P0] / P0
= [ 1000 - 896.81 ] / 896.81
= 103.19 / 896.81
= 0.1151
= 11.51%
Then, the Annualized rate will be:
= HPR at 6 Months / 6/12
= HPR × 12 / 6
= 11.51% × 12 / 6
= 11.51% × 2
= 23.01%
Annualized Rate = 23.01%
<span>The first step is to multiply the present value by the interest rate. Since the present value is $1.6 million and the interest rate is 10%, this yields. $160,000. This product is then divided by 1 - (1 + the rate)^-term. So it is divided by 1 - (1.1)^-15. That is, the annual payment = $160,000/[1 - 1.1^-15] = $160,000/.760607951= $210,358.04</span>
Answer:
Option (d) is correct.
Explanation:
Given that,
Elasticity of demand for Good A = −3
Percentage decrease in quantity demanded for Good A = 33%
Elasticity of demand for Good A = Percentage change in quantity demanded for Good A ÷ Percentage change in price of Good A
-3 = - 33 ÷ Percentage change in price of Good A
Percentage change in price of Good A = (-33) ÷ (-3)
= 11%
Therefore, percentage increase in price of good A is 11%.
This answer requires that we fill in the blanks
- The net present value (NPV) method estimates how much a potential project will contribute to shareholder wealth
- The larger the NPV, the more value the project adds; and added value means a higher stock price.
- The NPV calculation assumes that cash inflows can be reinvested at the project's risk-adjusted WACC
- When the firm is considering independent projects, if the project's NPV exceeds zero the firm should accept the project.
- When the firm is considering mutually exclusive projects, the firm should accept the project with the higher positive NPV.
What is the NPV?
In order to get the NPV we have to make the following calculations for the projects A and B.
This is calculated as
Project A
-900 + 620/1.08 + 395/1.08² + 200/1.08³ + 250/1.08⁴
= $355. 237
For the project B
We would have to perform similar calculation
Hence we would have
-900 + 620/1.08 + 395/1.08² + 200/1.08³ + 250/1.08⁴
= 378.98
From the calculations that we have done above, we can see that the value for project B is greater hence we have to choose project B.
Read more on NPV here:
brainly.com/question/17185385
#SPJ1
If the variable costs per unit were to decrease to $15.40 per unit, fixed costs increase to $992,800, and the selling price does not change, break-even point in units would: 68,093.2 Units
Solution:
The point of divergence is the manufacturing stage where production costs are equal to commodity sales. Investment is supposed to achieve a breakthrough if the market price of an asset is identical to its original cost.
New Break-even Point
= New Fixed Cost/(Selling Price - New Variable Cost)
= 
= 
= 68,093.2 Units
