Answer:
The answer is D, hope this helped!
Explanation:
The answer is D because its a realistic thing to have bills and sometimes you have to take risks or youll have nothing. <3
To economist, the social cost of union depends primarily on the people. People do not start their lives with fully developed theories about systems of society where unions are formed to fight for socialism. This organize monopolies to break down competition.
The searching companies can work for equity or debt loans in order to raise money on global capital markets. The debt of a foreign institution, lender, and other debt suppliers is also an option to raise money in the capital market. As equity loans include the sale of equity to investors, the issue of bonds is part of debt loans. Capital costs are usually less than in the domestic market and the company can even borrow money from the bank. And enterprises need to be very careful to take into account the risk of adverse exchange rates because, if the peso is to be depreciated, they should be aware of the cost of acquiring the currency needed to repay a foreign exchange loan.
Moreover, foreign equity, floating foreign or Eurobonds offerings, or borrowing on the Euro currency markets may be considered by the Mexican firm. The euro currency market would then certainly provide the company with additional funding at a lower rate domestically. And if the peso decreases in the next 2 years, the company has to repay the credit in a different currency unless the company can use the future market. The value of euro currency loans would definitely be reduced.
We can recognize that the use of both foreign and euro bonds has the same disadvantages as the bonds have to be repaid in an anti-peso currency. The international bond market has important points that are worth considering, given the fewer regulations, disclosure requirements, and fiscal implications if the currency risk can be properly analyzed and minimized. Since the foreign equity market requires no payment to its stockholders and also has the greatest independence from its actions, it is perhaps the most attractive for the company. So, if the hesitations are to be overcome, investors will likely have loan strong growth prospects.
Learn more about loans here
brainly.com/question/25239160
#SPJ4
The what-if analysis tool would be the most adequate choice for intricate calculations that need contrived optimization:
b). Scenario manager
- 'What-if analysis tool' is described as the tools that are employed to alter the values present in the cells.
- It is done to observe the effect of changing the values impact the results produced by the used formula.
- The what-if analysis tools have been categorized into three distinct types:
- a). Scenarios.
- b). Goal Seek.
- c). Data Tables.
- As per the question, in order to opt for complex calculations, 'Scenarios' what-if analysis would be most adequate as they examine a number of variables and set of numbers/values that affect the outcome.
Thus, <u>option b</u> is the correct answer.
Learn more about 'what-if tool' here:
brainly.com/question/14830872
Answer:
d. Enrique subscribes to the "bird in the hand "theory when it comes to dividends
Explanation:
Cash that is ready to use is better than having other assets that need to be converted into cash to be enjoyed later. This is the simple explanation of the "bird in the hand" theory. An investor who subscribes to this theory will highly likely prefer a cash dividend over a stock dividend.
