Answer:
$8.2 million
Explanation:
As per given data
EBITDA $22.5
Net Income $5.4 Million
Interest Expense = $6 million
Tax rate = 35%
As we know the Tax is deducted from the income before tax to calculate the net income. We will calculate the Earning before tax first.
EBT = Net Income x 100% / ( 100% - 35% )
EBT = 5.4 million x 100% / 65%
EBT = $8.3 million
Now we need to calculate the Earning Before interest and Tax
EBIT = EBT + Tax Expense = $8.3 million + $6 million = $14.3 million
The Difference between EBIT and EBITDA is depreciation and amortization expense.
Depreciation and Amortization expense = EBITDA - EBIT = $22.5 million - $14.3 million = $8.2 million
Answer:
d) will become an importer of tomatoes.
Explanation:
Consumer surplus would increase because the price at which they buy tomatoes would reduce while producer surplus would reduce because the price of tomatoes would reduce as a result of international trade.
Consumer surplus is the difference between the willingness to pay of a consumer and the price of the good.Because the price of tomatoes in the US is greater than the price of tomatoes in the world, when the US begins international trade, it would import tomatoes because it is inefficient in the production of tomatoes.
Producer surplus is the difference between the price of a good and the least price the seller is willing to sell the product
Answer:
This is really a personal opinion, since whether it is correct to send people to mars or not depends largely on your point of view and personal beliefs. Clearly, humans are far more capable than robots, and they can explore space and eventually other planets much better than a rover. On the other hand, sending people to Mars is not only extremely expensive, but it is also extremely dangerous for the astronauts themselves.
Imagine so many people died trying to get to space and then to the moon, and that was very easy compared to getting to Mars and back.
We can find millions of better ways to use the money than sending people to space, and that is really hard to argue against. Our planet, our country, state or even city could all benefit and use the money more productively.
But lets say that we do not care about the money because Mr. Bezos or some other billionaire decided to donate it. Now we would face the technical issues of going to Mars and actually staying there for a long time. A trip to mars is not something that would be carried out for just a couple of hours (like moon walking). Astronauts will have to stay in Mars for weeks, months or even years before they can return. This results in an extreme danger to their health due to cosmic rays. Can humans survive long term exposure to cosmic rays? The answer is NO and Mars's atmosphere doesn't help.
If we analyze this situation from a technical point of view, it would be better and safer to send astronauts to Titan (Saturn's moon), and would probably be also more useful. Titan's environment is similar to Earth's in many ways, and if we are actually doing it for a scientific purpose besides simply being curious, then it is much more useful to go to Titan. The scientific purpose of going to mars instead of other possible destinations is not very solid. Mars is really different to Earth and unless someone finds Martians living there, there is not much you can do.
What is the original statement?
Answer:
The student invests $60 each month and the interest rate is 6%. The interest rate is compounded monthly so we will take the interest rate as 0.5% (6/12).
The number of periods will be 420 (35*12) as the payments are made every month.
The present value is 0 as he is not making any investment at the start.
We need to find the future value of these payments, and for that we need to put these values in a financial calculator
PV= 0
PMT= 60
I= 0.5
N=420
Compute FV
FV=85,482
The total accumulated amount in the students annuity will be $85,482.
Explanation:
