1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
serg [7]
3 years ago
14

An investment firm recommends that a client invest in bonds rated​ AAA, A, and B. The average yield on AAA bonds is 4​%, on A bo

nds 5​%, and on B bonds 8​%. The client wants to invest twice as much in AAA bonds as in B bonds. How much should be invested in each type of bond under the following​ conditions? A. The total investment is ​$28 comma 000​, and the investor wants an annual return of ​$1 comma 460 on the three investments. B. The values in part A are changed to ​$38 comma 000 and ​$1 comma 990​, respectively.
Business
1 answer:
Sophie [7]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

let A = AAA bonds that yield 4%

let a = A bonds that yield 5%

let B = B bonds that yield 8%

A = 2B

A)

A + a + B = 28,000 (replace A with 2B)

0.04A + 0.05a + 0.08B = 1,460 (replace A with 2B)

2B + a + B = a + 3B = 28,000 ⇒ a = 28,000 - 3B

0.08B + 0.05a + 0.08B = 0.05a + 0.16B = 1,460 (replace a with 28,000 - 3B)

0.05(28,000 - 3B) + 0.16B = 1,400 - 0.15B + 0.16B =1,460

1,400 + 0.01B = 1,460

0.01B = 1,460 - 1,400 = 60

B = 60 / 0.01 = $6,000

A = $12,000

a = $28,000 - $6,000 - $12,000 = $10,000

AAA bonds = $12,000

A  bonds = $10,000

B bonds = $6,000

B)

A + a + B = 38,000 (replace A with 2B)

0.04A + 0.05a + 0.08B = 1,990 (replace A with 2B)

2B + a + B = a + 3B = 38,000 ⇒ a = 38,000 - 3B

0.08B + 0.05a + 0.08B = 0.05a + 0.16B = 1,990 (replace a with 28,000 - 3B)

0.05(38,000 - 3B) + 0.16B = 1,900 - 0.15B + 0.16B =1,990

1,900 + 0.01B = 1,990

0.01B = 1,990 - 1,900 = 90

B = 90 / 0.01 = $9,000

A = $18,000

a = $38,000 - $9,000 - $18,000 = $11,000

AAA bonds = $18,000

A  bonds = $11,000

B bonds = $9,000

You might be interested in
When marginal cost is greater than marginal benefit at the current activity level, the decision maker can increase net benefit b
Rainbow [258]

Answer: d. total cost will fall by more than total benefit will fall.

Explanation:

At this point where Marginal benefit is greater than marginal cost, it means that every additional unit produced gives a higher total cost than total benefit.

If activity levels were to be decreased therefore, total cost would fall more than total benefit would fall until a point is reached where total benefit and total cost would be falling at the same rate. This would be the optimal activity point because Marginal cost would be equal to Marginal benefit.

7 0
2 years ago
) a substance decays 22ach day. after 7 days, there are 9 milligrams of the substance remaining. how many milligrams were there
mamaluj [8]

A substance decays in 22ach days. after 7 days, there are nine milligrams of the substance last. milligrams had been there to start with:

at the give-up of each day, you are left with (100- 22)% = 7-8%, that is 0.7-8Tim.

To decay is described as to rot, lose strength or become worse. An example of degradation is while old fruit begins to rot. An instance of degradation is whilst a community begins to come to be crime-ridden. A falling into spoil.

a few common synonyms of deterioration are decomposed, putrefy, rot, and spoil. even as these types of words suggest "to go through negative dissolution," decay implies a sluggish exchange from a country of soundness or perfection.

The wooden of the white pine is long-lasting for indoor use, in particular, whilst covered by means of paint, however, while uncovered to moist air it swiftly decays, and it is very prone to dry rot; its miles are said to be excellent while grown on sandy soils.

Learn more about decays here: brainly.com/question/25537936

#SPJ4

7 0
1 year ago
On January 1, 2005 Franz Company purchased a truck that cost $22,000. The truck had an expected useful life of 5 years and a $4,
allochka39001 [22]

Answer: The amount of depreciation expense recognized in 2006, using the double declining balance method is $5,280.

And the journal entries required are:

Debit Depreciation expense                     $5,280

Credit Accumulated depreciation             $5,280

Explanation: The double-declining method is otherwise known as reducing balance method. It is usually derived by using the formula below:

Double-declining depreciation = 2 X SLDP X BV

Where SLDP = straight-line depreciation percentage

           BV = Book value of the asset (Cost minus depreciation)

So using the straight-line depreciation method, we need to remove the salvage value from the cost and then divided by 5 years. That is, ($22,000 - $4,000) / 5 years = $3,060 yearly depreciation expense.

However, under the double-declining method, we need to divide the 100% by the useful life of the asset first to get the SLDP then multiply by 2, that is, 100%/5 years = 20% x 2 = 40%.

So 40% x $22,000 in year 1 (December 31, 2005) is $8,800

In year 2 (December 31, 2006), 40% x $13,200 ($22,000 - $8,800) = $5,280 and so on. The depreciation expense would stop immediately it falls below the salvage value of $4,000.

So the book value of the asset at the end of year 2 is $7,920 ($13,200 - $4,000 accumulated depreciation).

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The variance of a sample of 121 observations equals 441. The standard deviation of the sample equals 1.91. 231. 21. 11.
Cloud [144]

The standard deviation of sample equals: 11

Explanation:

Given:

                                 variance of sample (S^{2}) = 121

                                 no, of observations made = 441

                                         standard deviation = ?

By using the formula:

                          Standard deviation (S) = \sqrt{variance}

                                                                 = \sqrt{S}

                                                                 = \sqrt{121}

                                                                 = 11

Hence the standard deviation is equal to 11.

 

6 0
3 years ago
If a nation exports much of its output but imports little, will it be better or worse off? How about the reverse? What if a nati
Angelina_Jolie [31]
This is the situation of countries like Germany,

Where exports > imports...
The results is definitely good for the country. It will increase its trade surplus. This allow the country to amassed a huge number of foreign reserves which they can use to invest abroad..

While countries that import > exports, will experienced trade loss/deficit (just think it like the reverse)
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Carla Vista Company, organized in 2019, has set up a single account for all intangible assets. The following summary discloses t
    5·1 answer
  • Since the 2008 global financial crisis, the B/L ("bill of lading") of container shipments from Asian factories to the United Sta
    10·1 answer
  • It is generally safe to provide your Social Security Number to:
    10·2 answers
  • Label the following hypothetical demand scenarios. Use the midpoint method.
    5·1 answer
  • Nish Corporation has provided the following data for the month of April:
    6·1 answer
  • Karen Meyer owns and operates Crystal Cleaning Company. Recently, Meyer withdrew $10,000 from Crystal Cleaning, and she contribu
    5·1 answer
  • Drag the tiles to the correct boxes to complete the pairs. Compare the sources of consumer credit
    14·2 answers
  • You have been engaged to review the financial statements of Flounder Corporation. In the course of your examination, you conclud
    15·2 answers
  • Interview can be defined as an attempt to
    9·1 answer
  • Solve it fast !!please​
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!