Answer:
7/10
Step-by-step explanation:
I've attached an image on how you can use the diagram they gave you.
If you color in 7/10s and 7/12s you'll notice that 7/10s is greater.
This is because 1/10 of the whole is greater than 1/12 of the whole.
For 1/10, the whole is being divided into 10, so it equals 0.1.
On the other hand, in 1/12, the whole is being divided by 12, so a part equals 0.083
0.1 is greater than 0.083, so 7 of 0.1 is greater than 7 of 0.083
Answer:
81
Step-by-step explanation:
u multiply 9 x 9 not 9x2
Answer:
7.6 ≤w
Step-by-step explanation:
Hey there!
In order to solve this inequality, you need to simplify the inequality like the following:
Subtract 3.4 from both sides
7.6 ≤w
This means that w is greater than or equal to 7.6
Answer:
The statement is missing. The statement is -- "A ray can be part of a line."
The answer is : The converse is not true, so Jahmiah is correct.
Step-by-step explanation:
A conditional statement is represented by showing p → q. It means if p is correct or true, then q is also correct or true.
And the converse of p → q can be shown as q → p.
But we know that the converse of a statement is not always true, it may be true and may not be true.
In the context, the statement is " a ray can be a part of a line." And so the converse would be "A line can be a part of the ray".
So by definition we know that a line is continuous line having no end points, it extends in one direction. While a ray starts from a point and extends to infinity in one direction.
Thus ray is part of line but line is not a part of the ray. So the converse of the statement is not correct.
Hence, Jahmiah is correct.
The answer would b C. 1,208 ft2
