The answer is "Weighing my options"
The first answer is correct. All poems use an intense expression of emotions in a unique style that has rhythm when spoken aloud.
The second option describes a biography or essay, and the third is an autobiography.
The fourth option can be true in poetry, but it does not define poetry; the intent of a poem is not solely about the appearance, but rather the contents.
Answer:
Hans Brinker and his younger sister participates in a Skating race whose winning prize is pair of silver skates. The belonged to a poor family and they did not had money to buy new skates for the competition. Hans has saved some money so he took those money out of the saving box to buy new skates but since his father is having some mental disorder the doctor asks for an immediate surgery. Hans gives all he has to the doctor and leaves the wish to buy new skates aside. Doctor is so inspired by this act of little child and so he plans to do his dad's surgery for free and returns money to Hans. The group of children who are taking part in the competition goes for a multi day skating journey. There Hans see a little hole from where water was flowing. Hans put his finger in the diike and he saves the city from big flood.
Answer: In my openion, philosophy that cannot be isolated from science, whether science, science or humanitarian, an old world was a philosopher and at the same time scientific.
But in the present time, the scientist of one science and the philosopher can find both isolated from the other.
Philosophy is based on the logic of our truth, and logic is the basic method of science because we start from our brain.
Explanation:
For me, philosophy is word and science action, philosophy awakens the interest of science among ordinary people, which arouses curiosity about knowledge and leads to a way of new discoveries and inventions.
There are three points;
1. To be a decent philosopher today, you need to have studied physics (and math) to understand in detail how reason works. For me, Michael Frayn (especially his play "Copenhagen" and his book "The Human Touch") is a good example. Godel's incompleteness theorems fundamentally limit what can be proven.
2 Science is always philosophical, regardless of whether the scientist is aware of it or not. Issam noted in his comment that "all scientists with a broad perspective" are generally aware of their philosophical requirements.
3. That is the difficult question. At the moment it seems to me that scientists and philosophers generally ignore each other with honorable exceptions (like Frayn or Roger Penrose). Many scientists print with popular books that have little understanding of philosophical questions and little understanding of the history of ideas. In some prominent cases, their philosophical opinions are ridiculously poorly informed. Would there be an "ever deeper interaction"!