Answer:
I think so I don't know if I am right or wrong so really sorry if I am
Answer:
No, death of Mercutio does not seem to be justified.
Death of Mercutio can not be justified because his death was accidental.
Neither Tybalt's death seem to be justified.
Explanation:
Romeo and Juliet is a Romantic Tragedy written by William Shakespeare.
In Act 3, Scene 1, of the play, in a feud between Tybalt and Mercutio, Mercutio was killed accidentally by Tybalt. Tybalt and Mercutio entered the sword fight after Tybalt continues to instigate Romeo for fight and Mercutio, being hot-tempered, challenged Tybalt for the feud. To stop the fight, Romeo enters the feud and in this, Tybalt's sword escapes Romeo's arm and stabs Mercutio to death.
So, this shows that Mercutio does not seem to die and his death can not be justified as his death was an accident.
Death of Tybalt also does not seem to be justified as he was killed in anger by Romeo to avenge the death of his friend, Mercutio. After killing Tybalt, Romeo also seem to realize that he should not have killed Tybalt.
Hello. You have not asked any questions related to this text, which makes it impossible for me to answer you. However, I will try to help you by showing you what this text means.
This text is an excerpt from "Romeo and Juliet" written by Shakespeare. As you may already know, "Romeo and Juliet" tells the story of forbidden love between Romeo and Juliet who are the children of enemy families and therefore cannot be together, even if they love each other.
This passage refers to the moment when Tybalt, Juliet's cousin, kills Romeo's friend Mercutio, completely unjustly and unnecessarily. Romeo, is upset by this death and decides to take revenge. It is at that moment that he declaims the words contained in that text, stating that revenge must be so complete, that he must kill Tybalt, or himself.
