The answer is relatedness
I hope that helped
the answer is: A cognitive psychologist enrolls undergraduate students for a computer-based study about the effect of mood on problem-solving behaviors.
Here the requirement for research with human subjects according to the Fed :
"Obtains information or biospecimens through intervention or interaction with the individual, and uses, studies, or analyzes the information or biospecimens; or Obtains, uses, studies, analyzes, or generates identifiable private information or identifiable biospecimens."
The experiment on this ption fulfill the criteria because:
- The experiment should use studies or analytics to obtain some sort of private information from the subjects. (such as their mood)
- The experiment should make some sort of intervention that can be used to measure its hypothesis. (in the case above, the researchers could put the subject under a certain level of stress before telling them to solve a set of problems)
- The researchers need to interact with the subject in a certain way. (since the researchers meet the undergraduate directly, it's considered as an interraction)
Tinker v. Des Moines, and Hazelwood v. kuhlmeier is the Supreme Court is about freedom of speech case, and United States v. Nixon is the rule of law case so the only answer is In Re Gault
<em>I think that the correct answer would be the second red dot to the right. Since every other circle (except for one of course) ends up following a line that takes it back into a circle around the Earth, which signifies that it has not left Earth's orbit. However, if you look at the second dot to the right, you can see that it is the first dot to not have a line connecting it back to Earths orbital field. This signifies that the object has finally overcome Earths gravitational pull.</em>
<em>Hope this helps and have a nice day.</em>
<em>- Kaikai Kitan</em>
The answer is 80%. hope it helps
